RUBY ALERT:
ExoPolitics Re: Peter Jennings' UFO Primetime Special
URL with correct formatting and hotlinks at
www.heartcom.org/exopolitics.htm
"Peter Jennings and his
staff should be ashamed."
"This change which is happening around us is
met with enmity
and a great deal of resistance because there?s
a huge psychological, economic and political
investment
in maintaining the Old World view."
"We must work
together and we must do it with love
and
courage in our
hearts, not with fear or anger.
.
"Fear and anger is really how people,
who want to keep the old paradigms in place,
want us act, especially in the United States."
DID YOU WATCH PETER JENNINGS'
PRIMETIME SPECIAL ON UFOS?
A GATHERING OF EXOPOLITICAL COMMENTARY
The Cabal's plans
include the Next Phase after the UFO Cover-Up is abandoned,
which is for public admission that UFOs are real, but at the same time putting
out
the message that those UFOs are full of vicious threatening terrorists from
space. (sic)
(And please stand out of the way while your Department of Defense shoots them
down.) [sick!]
.
"This is a manufactured
"Armegeddon", complete with human-manufactured
antigravity craft
posing as UFOs and attacking populated areas, providing the "provocation" that
"justifies"
a total global military response. This will be used by the Cabal as cover,
while they impose global martial law, and seek to
assume total control over the Earth.
.
"Be advised, be warned, be alert, be prepared to take counter-measures
appropriate at the time of the Next Phase."
PREFACE NOTE:
- Beware this final
manufactured "Armegeddon"
that is a set up
for the power elite's final terror-tyranny tactic for world control. Beware
their PROJECT BLUEBEAM to create a mock attack on
the world even as they created a mock attack on the World Trade Centers.
And beware PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD whereby the
mainstream monopoly media has been infiltrated by
power elite "Intelligence" (CIA) agents who provide an on-going "mock
attack" on truth (propaganda), demoralizing faith in a God of divine love.
The media danger is real.
- .
- The power elite do NOT want any higher
power,
higher intelligence
or higher love
conscience threatening their power over the hearts and minds of man.
They'll do anything at this late state in the game to maintain the mind
manipulation matrix of fear-based CONTROL that sacrifices the
power of love (God government) on their
virtually satanic (anti-Love) "altar" of government as god that
loves power
above all.
- .
- The "3-fold flame" of a God of Love (love of God) --
in our heart of hearts -- is the divine spark of
true power,
true wisdom and
true love that
KNOWS that endless war is the Satanic Rite of the REAL "evil doers" who
create and manage evil, war and hell on Earth so that "security" may result.
Duh!
This Big Lie has become so BIG, so BOLD and so often TOLD in the propaganda
press that the poor in spirit believe it... as in Hitler's Germany. The
COMMON SENSE of the U.S. Founders' vision of represented
God Government becomes uncommon. Without
GOD-LOVE VISION, the sheople believe the two-faced,
fork-tongued liar and his lie, and are herded over the cliff of morally
wrong political correctness.
- .
- The effete elite tactics are classic. First they
deny UFO's. Then they acknowledge them but paint them in the most
frightening tones of demonic, sex-abusing abductors to trigger our worst
archetypal fears of the unknown... as in the Fed disinfo that branded the
Branch Dividian Church Community (Waco) as "child molesting suicide
cultists" and condemned them to a fiery death on live TV... as in the Fed
disinfo that branded Japanese Americans as "potential terrorists", putting
them in concentration camps while incinerating half a million civilians at
Hiroshima and Nagasaki... as in the Fed disinfo that branded Arabs as
terrorists, putting them in concentration camps at Guantanimo after
demolishing the World Trade Center in a mock-attack that murdered 3000
Americans.
- .
- Now these REAL terrorists are desperate. The whole
world of enlightened Netizens KNOW the Truth of the intrigue and treachery
of dark-sinister forces entrenched in the power infrastructure of our core
institutions. Mainstream media mouthpieces of Church and State maintain the
Big Lie of separation from a God of Love in the name of the gods of war.
These fallen ones in high places are facing a hell of their own creation but
their time is short and their wrath is great, wanting everyone as miserable
as they are. End game drama.
- .
- As in the case of genocide of American Indians under
Fed propaganda of "No Indian is a good Indian", we now see the same "No
alien is a good alien" mindset being cultured with our worst fears being set
up in Hollywood movies like "SIGNS", Stephen Speilberg's "TAKEN" series on
the Sci-Fi channel, and Peter Jennings' UFO Special.
- .
- It ain't rocket science folks. For lack of
VISION, the sheople perish. And with
VISION, the wholeness and healing begins with the
holy spirit of LOVE-in-action
creating an "InnerNet" infrastructure at the
heart of
the Internet "TLC"
whereby local/global TeLeComm
honors the Christic imperative of true shepherds to "Feed
My Sheep".
- .
- Winning from the Beginning with the
TLC
rules whereby LOVE rules.
- .
- Christopher Rudy
-
Ambassador, Galactic Federation of Sovereign
Planets
- Author, Blueprint For A
Golden Age
--------- article follows:
VANCOUVER, B.C. ? On Thursday, February 24, 2005, two events came to pass:
Event #1:
CANADA REFUSES FURTHER ROLE IN U.S. MISSILE DEFENCE; and
Event#2:
ABC-TV SPECIAL: PETER JENNING REPORTING - UFO: SEEING IS BELIEVING
ABC NEWS: UFO Webpage
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Primetime/
EXOPOLITICS: COMMENTARY ON PETER JENNINGS CHUM/ABC-TV UFO SPECIAL
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd:
--- In UFOFacts@yahoogroups.com, G
Simms <grahamsimms22@y...> wrote:
>
> Wanted to thank Dr. Alfred Webre in Vancouver, his colleagues and others for
their work against the proliforation of land and space based weapons systems.
Their efforts and the influence they exerted in informing the public and
politicians regarding the dangers and realities of missile defence/space weapons
systems was realised today in Canada. The Prime Minister announced that Canada
would not participate in the development of the proposed missile defence system
with the US. How sane!
>
> Graham Simms
Dear Graham and UFO Facts - We at ICIS want to thank you all and especially Dr.
Richard Boylan for your support and your broad understanding that there is a
deep connection between preventing the weaponization of space and our
integration into Universe society. This is a key insight that all of us at the
Institute for Cooperation in Space,
including Dr. Carol Rosin have gradually bringing to the world. A
Universe-oriented perspective was crucial to helping the Government of Canada
arrive at this level of collective understanding. Our next step is to shepherd
the Governments of Canada, Russia, China and others to sign a
United Nations Space Preservation Treaty
banning weapons and warfare in space. You can join more than 2600 persons from
all over the world who have signed a Petition to the President of the UN General
Assembly to do just this:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/832338563
I personally found it very hopeful that on February 24, 2005, the very same day
that (1) Prime Minister Paul Martin announced that
Canada would not participate in the development of the proposed missile
defence system with the US, and that (2) ABC-TV held its celebrated-infamous
Special on UFOs, the CHUM network, which broadcast the ABC-TV Special in
Canada, (3) I was able to breakthrough as a mainstream futurist being
interviewed on CFRA, the prime CHUM Network political radio station in
Ottawa, the capital of Canada, speaking on Exopolitics. My vision and
affirmation is that Earth IS being peacefully integrated into a larger,
organized Universe society. In the same way that we were able to transform a
Prime Minister Paul
Martin who on April 27, 2003 called for Canada to join US Missile Defence,
so we will transform a human governmental structure that is now divided and
confused about integrating with Universe society to do so.
In other words, I feel that, as we were able to keep Canada out of U.S. Missile
Defence, so we will be able to deconstruct the information war against Universe
society, stop the war industry and transform it into a sustainable, peaceful
Space Age society. Properly understood,
Exopolitics provides us with a framework for integrating into a living,
receptive Universe society. Remember: More people beleive that Extraterrestrials
visit Earth than vote in disputed U.S. Presidential Elections (Roper Poll 2002).
By being Exopolitical, we can access the mainstream. We can call on Universe
society to facilitate our integration, and Universe society will do so. Maybe
not in the 3 dimensional ways one might expect, but in unsual multi-dimensional
ways which are just as effective, if not more.
We need: (1) A
Decade of Contact enrolling all human science, politics,institutions,
schools, curricula, communities in becoming aware of our being citizens of a
populated, organized Universe; (2) A Star Dreams Initiative - Public interest
diplomacy with spiritually-advanced off-planet cultures now visiting Earth.
I have been fortunate to have Graham Simms conduct a very insightful
Interview with me on Exopolitics, which Dr. Boylan has seen. I want to
thank Graham for that pioneering journalism, as it has helped spread a positive
message around the world. I recommend Graham's interview to you all.
Cheers, Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
-----------
Dr. John E. Mack
- "Many thanx to Paola Harris for sharing the late
Dr John E Mack's thoughts on the abduction phenomenon with the entire group,
something Peter Jennings' UFO special mysteriously failed to include despite
the fact that they had ample file footage of Mack being interviewed on this
very subject,...
what happened?!"
- Victor Martinez, 27
Feb. 2005.
- .
- "The contemporary Western tenet that we are alone
in the universe, conversant only with ourselves, is, in fact, a minority
perspective,
an anomaly."
John Mack, M.D.
Establishing a New Science of Human Experience
By Dr.John Mack
Lecture Transcription for Audio tape, Florence Italy
November 16th 2003
Thank you to the Gruppo Academico Scandicci GAUS and Paola Harris for
inviting me to Florence for this conference. What I'd like to do first is give
an overview of the "so called Abduction phenomena and lead into questions of how
do we know or what are the ways of knowing when we are dealing with something
this strange.
I also will discuss the implications of this and phenomena like this for
our world.
I am a Psychiatrist and Psychoanalyst and I have a special interest in
extraordinary experience. I'd like to discuss how our language shapes the
experience. For instance, words like "abduction" and alien shape the
conversation a certain way. The word "abduction" is off in two different ways
first, first, it implies that every person who has this encounter experience is
taken against his or her will like an abduction in human terms . It also implies
that each person who has an experience is physically taken, the whole body is
taken up into a craft, which is also not true in all instances.
Another aspect of contact is transferring information to humans
telepathically or showing us images. A lot of this information has had to do
with what our species are doing that is destructive to our planet. It is as if
what we are doing ecologically with the planet is creating some kind of larger
problem in the Galaxy. Also" the Experiencers "are given certain skills, certain
capabilities that they were not given in their schooling.
For instance they may discover that they may have a great artistic ability
that comes from this contact. Also they may have been given important
mathematical and scientific knowledge that goes way beyond anything they learned
in school and yet they are downloaded the most complicated mathematical formulas
and when the scientist and Physicist recognize that there is truth coming from
these individuals and sometimes more than the physicists themselves know, they
recognize it as genuine. I have personally seen many examples of these.
I'd also like to speak about the question of evidence, how do we know that
this experience is true? How do we evaluate these reports and how do we
determine truthfulness. For example when I evaluate, I become clear that people
of sound mind have no reason for making up this story. It is sure that they did
not get it from the media because often they know more than the media. But there
is something missing in what we have to evaluate or determine when a person
tells us a story so bizarre whether he/she is telling the truth and whether we
should take them seriously. But as yet we have had no criteria to evaluate the
truth of such encounters. So I am working on just this and I'm just beginning to
establish a science of Human Experience.
Now in traditional science when we observe certain phenomenon, we bring
some objectivity to what we have studied. But when you are trying to understand
something so profound and important to a person you can not stand back but you
must enter "into "the consciousness of that person. So what the critics will say
"what you are learning is too subjective" here is the problem, if you are going
to learn about something this profound, then the learning needs to be
"intersubjuctive. "
So still there is the problem of discovering the truth. If I say it just
feels like they are telling the truth, then this is not enough. So we have to
start with the "holistic way of knowing". This is close to what we know as
intuitive knowing. It is like a knowing of the heart and a knowing of the spirit
that has been part of traditional cultures for hundreds and thousands of years
but has been lost in the west.
I received some help in this matter from Vatican representative Monsignor
Corrado Balducci who says "we in the church take this UFO Encounter Phenomena
very seriously and the reason for that is, that there seem to be so many
reliable witnesses. In the church, we have had centuries of having to evaluate
miraculous reports by some kind of criteria and so they had to develop the
notion of the "reliable witnesses."
So I began to apply this idea of the reliable witness to these cases.
How do we know who is a reliable witness? For my cases, it not only had to do
with the fact just that these people who were trustworthy reported something but
it had to do with the power of their communication that came across to me. I
would experience with these people when they would be reliving their experience,
the most powerful vibration. I was in the presence of something awesome in its
intensity .The experiencers themselves would give language to that. They would
say something like "every cell in my body was vibrating"! When you are
in the presence of that, it passes your judging mind and you feel it in your
whole being.
Going back to "What is a reliable witness", it has to do with a resonance
between the person who is reporting or sharing the experience and the clinician.
It might be called "a direct knowing". You just know that with your whole being
that this person is telling the truth. There are other examples of this "direct
knowing" as demonstrated when the Tribunal that was hearing testimony of the
torture in Bosnia questioned witnesses. The Judge said after hearing the
testimony of a particular woman about how she was tortured. " I do not need
any more testimony". I can just tell that it is not possible that she is not
telling the truth. That is sufficient.
Now everyone knows torture exists. That is accepted. But it is not accepted
in our society that these UFO encounters exist. Therefore you need to have
evidence of a pattern of such similarities that is showing up in hundreds, if
not, thousands of cases. One of these experiencers is helping me out with this
statement she made about witnesses. " When a witness speaks, all recognize
that they have been in another realm. Sincerity and truth and power of spirit
are just as measurable as inches and pounds but not in the same way."
It is ironic that
experiences like alien abduction encounters, UFOs, Crop Circles, and near-death
experiences are called anomalies. In another words in our culture, what lies
outside the realm of the cultural agreement, about what is real is called
anomalous.
Therefore a huge amount of human experience is called anomalous when I have
discussed this with Native Americans, and they say it is not an anomalous. We
know about this. It is part of the human experience.
Estabishing a new "worldview"
In the last minutes, I want to talk about the matter of a worldview and
how it works. It has always been referred to as a paradigm. But I prefer to call
it worldview because it refers to something bigger. A worldview is the way we
organize reality. It is the way we believe
things work. In a way it is like an instrument of
navigation. Our worldviews is what holds the human
psyche together. What I came to realize with that Harvard Committee was that I
was threatening the scientific medical world View
by which they were living...
What has been the dominant worldview in our
society could be called Neutonian-Carticianism or anthropocentric, humanist. It
is a worldview that puts the human being as top of the cosmic hierarchy of
intelligence.
The simplest term for this is, is that which I call Scientific Materialism.
In this world view, matter and energy is the primary reality and there is no
larger intelligence in the Cosmos. The principle method of study is objective
reality which separates the investigator from the matter that is being
investigated. Now in recent years, this view, which has dominated our society,
is failing. It is failing in every important element that the worldview is
supposed to serve.
.
First there is a huge amount of phenomena, which it can not explain nor
deal with. There is no method of study for many things that we are talking about
today.
Secondly, it leads to terrible destructiveness because it treats the entire
planet as simply physical resources to fight over by who are the most powerful
and most important countries.
Thirdly, "scientific materialism" does not give human beings any real
satisfaction. It leaves us without spirit and it leaves us with an empty
feeling. Because all it has to offer are more and more material things
Now we have new emerging worldviews that are different. In this worldview,
there is intelligence dwelling in the universe. That experience which happens to
my clients is one example of the intelligence dwelling in the universe and the
beings that have come to my clients are another example.
.
The Crop Formations are also evidence of this intelligence that is trying
to communicate with us. Also it is a model of the universe and us in it which
says that everything is connected with everything else and we know that "cutting
edge" physics is supporting this worldview. So it includes not only new ways of
knowing but it also involves a spiritual awakening.
This change which is happening around us is met with enmity and a great deal
of resistance because there?s a huge psychological
economic and political investment in maintaining the Old World view.
I will give you one examples of the UFO resistance because books being written
which discuss this new paradigm are being called "new age, pseudoscientific,
psychcentric in order to dismiss them as out of hand because some people who
write such books do not hold themselves responsible to any scientific standards
what so ever.
I will conclude by speaking about the implications of this new worldview.
We see around us all kinds of forces which are supporting the emergence of this
way of thinking. People around the planet are opening up to new ways of
thinking. Groups, like the GAUS (GRUPPO ACADEMICO UFOLOGICO SCANDICCI), are
committed to the new emerging paradigm.
How would this planet be different if the emerging world view became be the
dominant world view?
We would be connected to all living beings not
just those around us, and with all nature and spirit which would make it
impossible for us to treat nature in such a exploitative way.
For example we would be able to identify with other peoples, other religions
and with all animals so we would not treat them just as products to consume.
With this deeper reality, we could
appreciate that we are connected to the Divine,
the creative principle which would be more fulfilling than
the material focus that has been so dominant today.
So it would be global like a
"global awakening of the heart."
instead of global exploitation, a word that has that connotation today. I might
add "opening of the heart "
has been a fundamental aspect of alien encounter experience I learned from my
dealing with experiencers. Sometimes experiencers get information from these
beings that we are not just a menace to the Earth but we are a menace to the
Galaxy.
.
In conclusion, as this emerging paradigm --this emerging world view --
takes hold, we might become more responsible citizens of a galaxy instead of
becoming the eminent menace we appear to be!
----------
KATHY (KIT) VAQUILAR
International Contact Support Network
Many in the UFO community have responded to Peter Jennings' "UFO's: Seeing is
Believing" with a lot of frustration and deep anger -- again. Anger is good if
it's turned towards positive energy, but negativity has reined in the ranks of
the community for a very long time and for a reason, but it's getting too old.
Anger will not move this community forward unless we all band together with more
creative and positive energy, and also take care of each other. The Universe is
always calling us to this task. Anger is a fire energy and from fire there is
either great destruction and/or great creativity. Its our own community's
responsibility to get its act together and to keep working together at it,
supporting each other in many ways. It's not the responsibility of the beings in
the UFOs to do this for us. We have been asked to do this for a long time by
them. People like Peter Jennings or the other skeptics in their own ways are
asking us to do this too, but they come at it from
a very different angle.
The solution to all these negative mainstream media
blitzes that fail so badly on the UFO subject is not to mourn, but to organize
and to create something that's better. To not be
afraid, but to be courageous. To not sit back, but
to get out there and do the work. It's not over until it's over. Many of us
are in this for the long haul because we've been contacted. Most of you know
that I'm an experiencer, but I have never seen myself as a victim of abduction.
It was a matter of figuring out what I had and have to learn in this life. The
beings I encountered keep inspiring me, but they too find human beings
frustrating to work with because of our limitations as 3 dimensional creatures.
They find the UFO community frustrating to work with. We find each other as
humans frustrating to work with.
We must work together and we must do it with love and courage in our hearts, not
with fear or anger. Fear and anger is really how
people, who want to keep the old paradigms in place, want us act, especially in
the United States. If we let our anger and
frustration get in the way we are simply playing into their hands. The UFO
community will help change this world for the better if our combined positive
energies of free willed manifestation are at the center of our collective
awareness and actions -- even when the chips look like they're coming down.
We have another opportunity here! It's time to act and time for us to work
together -- again and again.
1) ABC can be reached at:
ABC, Inc.
500 S. Buena Vista Street
Burbank, CA 91521-4551
(818) 460-7477
Tell them what you think.
2) Share the absolutely best UFO video of all time to your family, friends, and
community. It's an award winning film called "OUT
OF THE BLUE" and it's really good! Go to
www.outoftheblue.tv
for more info. Even that film made the folks at "Skeptic Magazine" think
twice. ICSN will be assisting OOTB again with local distribution here in and
from the Bay Area. Help us get that great film out -- again!
3) Support the UFO folks in your locations and elsewhere to keep doing what
they're doing to advance Disclosure and related information, because they're
doing most of the work out of pocket on their own funds.
There are two good conferences coming up that I'll send you more info on soon --
International UFO Congress and
Steven Bassett's PRG Conference. If you can attend or help spread the word,
please do.
4) ICSN will be meeting again soon in the springtime.
Let's keep changing the world for the better. Believe me, that's the message
that the beings want us to listen to and act upon. No, they aren't going to eat
us. That's mostly dis- and misinformed entertainment that started with the
radio program "War of the Worlds", which Steven Spielberg and Tom Cruz are
resurrecting soon at a theater near you. As for the negative ETs that seem to
pop up sometimes? I think we have more to worry about with the negative human
beings who are already inhabiting our planet and creating havoc around the
world.
Peace and best wishes,
KATHY (KIT) VAQUILAR
International Contact Support Network
kitkatshado@earthlink.net
---------------
Peter A. Gerston, Esq.
PAG COMMENTARY: ABC-TV UFO PROGRAM
Not surprisingly most followers of the exploits of our enigmatic aerial craft
found the media's latest presentation, hosted by Peter Jennings, disappointing.
But why would any "true believer" expect otherwise - especially when the "status
quo" is to continually deny the obvious?
The real significance of the TV special was the placement of this latest UFO
"programming" in prime time - specifically up against three of the most popular
shows on TV - "Apprentice," "CSI," and "Survivor." Could some group be
attempting to gauge the public's interest in a "first-contact" scenario?
.
When released the Nielson ratings for last week will reveal the present state of
the public's interest in the phenomenon. If Jennings' program beats out any of
the three mega-hits - I will be amazed. If it finishes within the top ten - I
will be pleasantly surprised.
After almost 60 years of continuous appearances - the UFO mystery still remains
"behind-the-curtain" and will continue to do so - until our non-human
guests decide otherwise. Make no mistake - it is the
Intelligence that controls
all aspects of its contact with this reality - not us!
"UFO" related events - both direct and indirect - both real and hoaxed - happen
for a reason. Simply because we do not understand that reason does not diminish
their programming importance. So for all of you who are disappointed with the
UFO program last week - I suggest you look beyond the obvious.
-.:PAG:.- ufolawyer@msn.com
-------------------
[ECETI News] Budd Hopkins on Peter Jennings UFO
undocumentary
During the past year Jenning's producers
interviewed me a number of times, and because I sensed what they had in mind, I
made, as a preemptive strike, a number of careful, highly specific observations
about the UFO abduction phenomenon. All of these crucial points - recorded by
ABC on videotape - were designed to underline the physical reality of UFO
abductions and to demonstrate the implausibility of current skeptical
explanations.
To its shame, ABC suppressed ALL of these
observations.
I knew, of course, that
the skeptics' favorite explanation du jour is impossibly simple: abduction
reports, they believe, are all due to misperceived "sleep paralysis." Ranking
as a distant second is another erroneous belief: abduction reports, they say,
"ONLY emerge under hypnosis," and since hypnosis is "totally unreliable", all
abduction reports must be discarded.
In the light of these tediously familiar errors and misstatements, I made
certain in my taped interviews to explain the following:
- > In the first two decades of our research, ALL of
the central abduction cases involved people who were outside their houses
when they were taken. NONE were lying paralyzed in their bedrooms. They
were driving cars, walking, fishing, hunting and even, in one famous case,
driving a tractor on a farm. "Sleep paralysis" as a blanket explanation of
UFO abductions is therefore, ipso facto, a ludicrous non-starter.
Nevertheless ALL of my insistent
statements on this point were systematically eliminated by the producers.
> Second, I indicated
that there are many abuction reports involving two, three, six or more
people who were taken simultaneously and whose highly detailed recollections
are virtually identical. This fact alone eliminates not only "sleep
paralysis" but "fantasy-proneness" or any other idiosyncratic psychological
aberrations as triggering causes. My
descriptions of these many cases of multiple abductions were likewise
completely suppressed by the producers.
> Third, I showed the
interviewers many photos of, again, virtually identical scoop marks,
consistent straight-line scars and ground landing traces at abduction sites,
and other physical sequelae. ALL of these
vivid photographic examples of physical evidence were suppressed by the
producers.
> Fourth, I was not
alone in making these points. My colleague Dr. David Jacobs was asked by
ABC to carry out a hypnotic regression for the camera, but since the woman
he chose had been abducted in the daytime while driving a car,
the case did not fit ABC's "sleep paralysis" agenda
and was thus not only suppressed, but Dr. Jacobs' many hours of taped
interviews were also scrapped.
> Fifth, I made it very
clear that perhaps 30% of all the abduction reports collected by researchers
are recalled WITHOUT THE AID OF HYPNOSIS, a fact which renders the issue of
hypnosis moot. This point was also suppressed
by the producers whose only goal, it appeared, was to eliminate any data
that contradicted their transparently false debunking hypotheses.
Despite my having presented -
and reiterated - the points above, the producers chose to trot out on camera two
debunking scientists (whose experiments with a mere handful of subjects have yet
to be taken seriously by the psychological community) to buttress the untenable
"sleep paralysis" theory, the false "no physical evidence" claim, and the
demonstrably untrue "its all hypnosis" assertion. The smug presentations of
these two would-be experts were accompanied by the producers' lurid
"reenactments" of "sleep paralysis" phenomena,
complete with flashing lights and spooky music.
The taped testimony of a serious mental health professional like Dr. John Mack
was likewise suppressed, along with my statement that over the years eight
psychiatrists and numerous other mental health professionals had come to me
about their own UFO abductions. The producers'
obvious goal was to conceal the fact that within the mental health community
there are many professionals who look with amusement on the "sleep paralysis"
theory, and who accept the physical reality of UFO abductions.
So what can one say about such a deliberately
dishonest presentation as Peter Jenning's "Seeing is Believing" take on
abductions? Perhaps one can only shrug and warn, yet again, that the incurious
members of the press and the many blinkered, conservative scientists had better
collectively pull their heads up out of the sand and join us in our work.
Whatever one's personal attitude toward the UFO abduction phenomenon, science
insists that an extraordinary phenomenon demands an extraordinary investigation.
.
What ABC served up on Thursday night was, instead, an extraordinary whitewash
of the abduction phenomenon, and a brutal suppression of the evidence for what
may well be the most portentous event in human history.
Peter Jennings and his staff should be ashamed.
Budd Hopkins / New York, Feb 25, 2005.
http://www.intrudersfoundation.org/
--------------
Kathy "Kit" Vaquilar,
International Contact Support Network
Quick ICSN Media Review: "UFOs: SEEING IS BELIEVING" / PETER JENNINGS
DOESN'T BELIEVE IN UFOs
VICTOR:
Please feel free to share our group's thoughts on Jennings' program with your
readers too -
Thanks,
Kathy Vaquilar,
International Contact Support Network,
kitkatshado@earthlink.net
On February 24, 2005, Entertainment Tonight reported that Peter Jennings does
not believe in UFOs. One of Jennings' conclusions in ABC's "UFOs:Seeing is
Believing" was that Roswell is a myth. Jennings did
a very sophisticated journalist's job of dismissing the UFO subject as
"myth-making" by unscientific believers.
However, he also presented some impressive modern
and historical records, interviews and testimony from quite an array of
professional experts and civilians who can't all be discounted in the UFO field.
His program left his audience to their own conclusions and seemed to give more
weight to well funded scientists like SETI's Seth Shostak, who want material
evidence such as "pens" and "wheel parts" from UFOs, than to many expert
eyewitnesses.
This wasn't surprising at all. Jennings wanted to come across as balanced and
rational in his reporting, but his own beliefs still leaked through. It would be
hard for him to hide that. After all, his career
would be at stake.
"UFOs: Seeing is Believing" started out sounding
sympathetic to the phenomena, but also gave critics and skeptics major air play.
It came down to pitting "believer" against "nonbeliever" -- again and again.
Whatever evidence is available was still not enough, especially for mainstream
scientists and skeptics, who seemed to count more than the witnesses and UFO
researchers themselves.
Personal perspectives and subjective views continue to play a major role in
the formation of opinions
on this controversial topic and how far one is willing to go with those views.
It's unfortunate that Dr. John Mack was not available to counter his fellow
psychologists from Harvard on this national TV show.
A couple of them came out and put forth the
repeated theory that the abduction experience is
simply caused by sleep paralysis and a certain level of Rapid Eye Movement
(R.E.M.) that can be used to explain many paranormal experiences.
Bob Hopkins was shown and left alone to fend for himself as an artist leading in
abduction research with hypnosis as his only tool. Hypnosis was conveyed as
unreliable. Peter Davenport was interviewed as the only full time UFO
investigator in the entire United States.
Michio Kaku was given the limelight to express himself, and as a scientist he
encouraged viewers and colleagues by exclaiming, "Let the investigation
begin." His inclusion as a contemporary physicist, who wants us to open up
our minds to more possibilities, was very refreshing to hear amidst the more
traditional and conservative skeptics who think interstellar space travel is too
difficult to conceive and that radio waves are the most advanced form of
communication in space by ETs.
Jennings' traditional "objective" journalism was displayed well in his program
and gave both sides their day in court. However, sometimes it felt a bit
schizophrenic going back and forth. He also stated that in courts, eye witness
reports are considered "high evidence", whereas in science, it is "low
evidence."
Jennings ended his special with "Ultimately only contact is going to solve
the mystery." Problem was that those who told
Jennings and his staff that they had contact were already dismissed by him and
others on television. There was obviously a lot
covered in his special, which I didn't mention here, and also a portion that
reminded me of some of journalist Terry Hansen's work related to the history of
media with UFOs and the U.S. government's dismissal of the phenomena that was
designed to keep our population under emotional
control.
Historian Richard Dolan, Stanton Friedman and many
others we're familiar with were key sources for Jennings to tap into. I hope you
were able to catch "UFOs: Seeing is Believing" on television. It was a
professional piece, but still not the best work out there on mainstream
television. However, it's a real technical notch above anything else that the
other national networks like NBC and Fox have done in the past.
Thank ABC that Jennings did not wear a trench coat with scary music playing
throughout the broadcast. In spite of its shortcomings, "UFOs" was a slick piece
of mainstream media work that both denied and acknowledged the phenomena. It
still left enough room for further discussions in chat rooms and elsewhere.
I'm sure there will be many people talking about this show over the next few
days to weeks. Disney-owned ABC probably received the ratings that they were
looking for. If that's the case, they may come out with another UFO program to
follow this. Let's hope it gets better, especially in regards to further real
Disclosure, but it will still take more work on our part to keep pushing that
through. Art Bell is probably up late discussing this one. He and Ramona were
also featured by Jennings.
In the meantime, I have to get some shut eye myself so I can perhaps experience
some of my own sleep paralysis and R.E.M.
Good Night,
KATHY (KIT) VAQUILAR
International Contact Support Network
-------------------
http://www.rense.com/general63/ufocom.htm
ABC's "Seeing Is Believing"
UFO Special
Comments
[...]
Reagan let the cat out of the bag when he made the statement that the countries
of the world would put aside their differences and join as one if they were
suddenly confronted by a force from outside this world.
The machine is manufacturing a new enemy.
The controllers behind the curtain need aliens to be real.
They have to become real before we can
learn to fear them.
They have to be real before we learn to hate them.
They have to be real before we will surrender ourselves to those who would
defend us.
They have to be real before they can become a tool in the trade of
deception.
[...]
-------------------------
Richard Boylan, Ph.D
02/25/05
Friends,
My take on the misguided Jennings UFO Special (what was printable) is
presented below.
On the whole, the ominous thing I think that Peter Jennings has signaled is
the onset of a Phase Shift in the Cabal policy: one predicted by German
scientist Werner von Braun, and reported by aerospace contractor Dr. Carol
Rosin.
Rocket scientist von Braun had the highest security clearances, including
for UFO information, and was let in on the scenario that the Military-Industrial
Complex was developing for their Cabal masters.
The Cabal's plans include the Next Phase after the UFO Cover-Up is abandoned,
which is for public admission that UFOs are real, but at the same time putting
out the message that those UFOs are full of vicious threatening terrorists from
space. (sic) (And please stand out of the way while your Department of Defense
shoots them down.) [sick!]
This is a manufactured
"Armegeddon", complete with human-manufactured
antigravity craft posing as UFOs and attacking populated areas, providing the
"provocation" that "justifies" a total global military response.
This will be used by the Cabal as cover, while they impose
global martial law, and seek to assume total control over the Earth.
Be advised, be warned,
be alert, be prepared to take counter-measures appropriate at the time of the
Next Phase.
In the light,
Richard Boylan, Ph.D.
- -------------------- more from Boylan:
- Friends,
-
- Like many of you. I turned in to the Peter
Jennings Special last night: "UFOs: Seeing Is Believing". If I had
discretionary funds, I'd have undertaken this morning to sue Jennings/ABC
for consumer fraud.
- Peter Jennings knows better than the mish-mash of
UFO reports and debunker put-downs he served up to the American public. He
admitted as much to Jon Stewart of "The Daily Show" on Jon's broadcast
Wednesday night. On that program, Jennings admitted to Stewart that he
thought UFOs were real, and that the only question left in his mind was who
was piloting them. This is a very telling statement. It suggests that the
_real_ Peter Jennings knows that high-performance antigravity craft abound
in our skies, and that the only question remaining is which are Star Visitor
craft, and which are ours.
- But the fake Peter Jennings, the one on-camera
Thursday night, served up a bland pastiche of tired old UFO film clips:
clips of unqualified amateur hypnotist Budd Hopkins regressing experiencers
(as though hundreds of qualified, credentialed, behavioral science
professionals specializing in competently working with experiencers didn't
exist), clips from the lurid TV show "Taken" showing a guy strapped to an
"alien" table screaming, and, worst offense of the evening, showing as the
expert on experiencers from Harvard University not the world-renown Dr. John
Mack, but an unknown graduate student repeating disinformation about all
close encounters being merely "hallucinations" induced by "sleep
paralysis". The student further showed her ignorance by claiming that such
sleep paralysis hallucinations are "common", whereas they are relatively
rare, very rare in contrast to the abundant numbers of actual incidences of
Star Visitor encounters.
- The Jennings offering shows that the Cabal still
control what the public gets to see from "credible" news sources.
- As for Jennings, his journalistic integrity is
in the tank.
- With David Brinkley gone, and Dan Rather
retiring, it is now time for the last of the Big Three anchors to pack it
in. No loss.
- .
- Richard Boylan, Ph.D., LLC
- Website:
www.drboylan.com
----------------------
[ECETI News] James Gilliland
I commend Peter Jennings on bringing out the UFO issue on prime time. What many
people do not realize is just the idea of UFOs entering into the collective
consciousness on such a large scale creates an opening, a pondering of the
subject. That opening allows the inspiration of the benevolent beings to enter.
People who are curious; sincere about finding out the truth will start their own
investigations. I thought the show went well in the beginning presenting
witnesses with great credentials. Then there was the debunkers who looked rather
ridiculous. They will look even more ridiculous in the days to come because full
disclosure by the UFOs themselves in on the horizon. The main stream media had
to address the subject because if they do not due to the mass sightings they
will loose what little credibility they now have. If it isn't obvious by now the
media is completely controlled other than a few slips now and then which are
quickly dealt with. A journalist will get fed up with the nonsense and have
moment of courage and integrity only to find themselves making retractions and
public apologies or doing the 4 AM news hour in some small mid western town.
My grandfather sold equipment to the ranch where the UFO crashed. There were two
incidents the other ship crashed not far away in flight time. There were bodies
and the secret government projects started years after the event. My grandmother
who knows Peter Jennings is probably writing him a letter right now. She knew
the sheriff, and police involved in the incident as well as others. She told me
they were good old boys, very shaken by the event and they are honest as the day
is long. Maybe Peter and company can learn something from these folks. To be
honest with you I fell asleep three quarters of the way through the show. It was
old news, boring and lacked real substance. The SETI interview was beyond
ridiculous. Why didn't Peter ask Seth about his debate with Stanton Freedman. It
was a slaughter. Why didn't he ask if SETI had to go through NSA before they
could release anything? What about NASA which is also under government
restraints. Paul Allen was duped into investing millions into a array of disks
when for 15 dollars he could have bought our DVD and had all the proof he
needed. SETI knows about the contacts at the ranch but they already have
millions and big salaries, an investment in keeping them far away in the
distance. NASA has incredible footage of UFOs with comments by astronaughts, top
people in mission control who said every one of our space flights was shadowed
by UFOs. The Times/CNN poll stated that over 80% of the people believe in UFOs
and there is a government cover-up. Not 50%. Was there a little bias there?
We offered Peter and company an interview along with all the stills, video and
testimony of over 3000 eyewitnesses that have come to the ranch. Top physicists
were willing to go on the record stating undeniably these are not known craft,
extremely advanced vehicles under intelligent control. There were several people
in contact with the Peter Jennings crew and made them aware of what is
transpiring at the ranch along with giving them contact information yet we did
not hear a thing. I even tried myself to contact them and never received a
response. Does Peter Jennings want to know the truth or does he already know the
truth and has to stay within accepted guidelines? There are literally millions
of sightings a year around the world, we have enough UFO parts and craft from
crash sites to fill a football stadium. There is incredible undeniable footage
from around the world which is readily available. The scientists that say there
is not proof are either totally out of the loop, ignorant or part of the
disinformation campaign. Let's see a real documentary. It is an insult to the
intelligence of America to continue to create these fence sitting substance
lacking documentaries. When you have footage of UFOs responding to over 60
people on the ground, dropping down and lighting up the whole field on cue why
not show it? There is footage of ships arriving with advanced notice displaying
extremely advanced electronics, morphing from one to three, changing colors,
dematerializing and rematerializing. Why not make this available? Is it to
real? The one thing that brings me solace is the fact that I know without a
doubt UFOs are real, they will reveal themselves in mass in the near future and
there will be a lot of egg on the faces of those who continue in the charades.
By the way if anyone knows Paul Allen tell him we can show him a UFO he can
personally video tape for free if he is serious about wanting to know the truth.
Same goes for Peter Jennings. I think after grandma gets through with him he
might change his tune. Feel free to forward this email far and wide. People have
the right to know.
Be well
James Gilliland www.eceti.org
Peter Jennings and UFOs: Spinning and Deceiving
http://keyholepublishing.com/peter_jennings_and_ufos.htm
By Richard M. Dolan
February 25, 2005
copyright ?2005 by Richard M. Dolan. All rights reserved.
Within the UFO community, this was the most anticipated media event in a long
time, perhaps since the 50th anniversary of Roswell in 1997. Cable networks,
such as the History Channel and SciFi Channel, have been getting into the mix
with documentaries on the subject for some time, but the major networks have
been silent for years. And whenever there was an occasional treatment of the
subject, it was always to debunk.
So when it appeared that ABC was attempting to do something "serious" about the
subject, a few people asked me what I thought would happen. Especially since I
have written previously that I absolutely did not believe that a major network
would be able to handle this subject in a forthright manner.
To such readers, I predicted that ABC would not completely debunk UFOs, but it
would also not endorse them. I said under no circumstances would there be any
hint of credence given to a conspiratorial angle, that I would be shocked if any
mention was made of deep black military technology, or of claims that we are now
in possession of alien technology and bodies.
As far as the UFO topic goes, that?s where the action is, at least for those of
us who are interested in the structure of power of this world.
These predictions turned out to be true. No surprise, and I imagine there were
others who predicted the same thing. Although I have to say I was surprised by
the number of pre-Special commentators who seemed to think that this event could
trigger some form of immanent disclosure.
I support the goal of UFO disclosure. Indeed, I consider it to be a critical
goal of UFO research. But we must realize that if or when disclosure ever comes,
it will be on someone?s terms. That is, the terms of covert players that have a
specific agenda. Under such a situation, UFO researchers must be vigilant in
determining how much information is being given out, and how much of it is true.
We may ask, why would ABC do a UFO special at all? For ratings? This in fact is
what many media people cynically seem to be implying. In fact, it appears that
the special helped ABC a little in that regard, but not a lot.
Could it be out of a sense of sheer intellectual and public responsibility?
Okay, now that we?re done laughing, let?s move on...
It is ludicrous to think that ABC?s leadership just decided to "do" a special
like this. When dealing with the powerful media ? which George Orwell today
would certainly describe as our Ministry of Truth ? one must assume there is a
political (and in this case national security) goal. This is, after all, a
critical national security topic. Major media is in bed with our national
security apparatus. This ain?t your great-grandpa?s U.S. of A., sonny. It?s
become more like the old Soviet Union. Indeed, we have to watch ABC in the same
way that the people who used to be called "Sovietologists" analyzed official
Soviet public statements. "What does so-and-so really mean by that? What is the
significance of this person?s presence or absence at an official function?" As
Tass was to the Soviet elite ? the primary mouthpiece and propaganda instrument
? so are the major networks of today, including ABC, to America?s power elite.
Thus, we might ask, was ABC attempting to "prepare the public?" Or, instead,
some form of spin control?
Looks like spin control to me.
The program essentially worked by building up something of a legitimate-looking
case, a kind of "bringing out the best evidence" (which was not the best
evidence), then puncturing the case with the help of spokespersons for the
scientific community. I say spokespersons because many of these people weren?t
scientists. Thus, you set up a straw man and then knock him down.
For about the first hour, the show provided a decidedly "pro-UFO" crescendo. We
saw Art Bell and his wife discuss their UFO sighting, we saw some Phoenix lights
video, clips of CUFOS Director Mark Rodighier, and (in my opinion) a very good
handling of the Illinois "Cop" sighting of 2000. The space given to skeptics for
most of that first hour was limited, although peppered in various places so you
didn?t forget about them.
The next segment provided some history, of a sort. For anyone who knows this
material, this was extremely basic and low level. But more seasoned UFO
researchers and readers must remember that most viewers of this special are at
the Kindergarten-or-less level of knowledge. If the typical researcher is at a
level nine or ten, then most people are at a zero or one. So if the ABC special
gets even to the level of three ... well, you get the idea.
I understand that you have to walk before you can run, and it?s not realistic to
expect ABC to condense a topic with the complexity of the UFO phenomenon into a
mere two hours without a lot of material ending up on the cutting floor. But
what we had was sheer spin.
Mr. Jennings repeats the U.S. government position (a lie) that it is not in the
business of investigating UFOs. Well, that essentially removes the military from
this discussion.
But why, one may ask, during the days of Project Blue Book, when the Air Force
did have a public investigation of UFOs, did they dishonestly debunk so many
reports? ABC certainly showed that Blue Book was dishonest, that it was never a
legitimate investigative effort. Here was an opportunity for honest journalism
to attack some significant issues.
Instead, we "learn" that the orders to debunk UFO reports were in order to
remove the threat of clogged communication channels caused by a hysterical
public. Nothing to do with the objects themselves.
While the recounting of the 1968 Minot AFB UFO encounter was well done, the
opportunity for asking some serious questions was ignored. Such as, what could
that object have been? Or, what is the likelihood that this incident had
repercussions within the military-intelligence community hierarchy that were
beyond Blue Book?
That was essentially the first hour. The balloon was expanding, albeit in a
conventional and sanitized manner. Still, for much of America, I would bet that
even this was pretty strong stuff.
So, it was time to let some air out.
Thus we get the SETI people. We get to hear about Jill Tarter?s UFO sighting,
which was actually the moon. (Seemingly implying that all UFO sightings are
conventional objects). We get Frank Drake and Seth Shostak. Why?
Then we come to Roswell. Roswell is important because it has become, in the
public mind especially, the cornerstone of the "conspiracy" argument. In
reality, an overwhelming argument for a UFO government conspiracy can be very
easily made without reference to Roswell, but never mind. You kill the one and
you at least disable the other for the time being.
Jennings immediately and ceaselessly used the word "myth" to describe the
Roswell crash of 1947. ABC pulled out all the stops, even to the extent of
seriously maligning the most persistent Roswell researcher of all, Stanton
Friedman. This was cheap and underhanded. Friedman was given almost no air time
whatsoever, and was portrayed as a cheap "promoter" of the Roswell myth, like a
modern day P. T. Barnum. This is absurd. Without recourse to anything but the
official Air Force propaganda, Roswell was decreed by ABC to be an article of
faith, with no credible witnesses, and possessing "not a shred of evidence."
Roswell may or may not have been everything Friedman or other proponents have
maintained, but the Air Force study ? itself a deeply flawed undertaking ? was
accepted without reservation.
With a half hour to go, the Special came to abductions. I was expecting to see
Dr. Michael Persinger on this segment, discussing tectonic stress theory and the
sense of "presence." Fortunately, I was wrong. But in fact the replacement crew
was just as bad. Thus, after a sympathetic treatment of Budd Hopkins, we get
Harvard psychologists and ... yes, sleep disorder paralysis. What was galling
about this part was the absence of the late John Mack, the other Harvard
professor. Before Mack was killed last summer (some believe suspiciously) by a
motorist on a lonely road late at night while in Britain, he had been
interviewed for this special. Why was he left off? Inexcusable.
Abduction researchers will tell you, by the way, that despite the sleep
paralysis argument, there is physicality to this experience, in the form of odd
and unexplainable body marks (scoops, triangular-patterned dot formations, etc.)
While this is not proof of abductions per se, these marks are real and common
among abductees. A truly dispassionate documentary would have dealt with this.
Finally, we reach the problems of space travel. Yes, the "distance" argument.
"The aliens can?t get here from there." What was surprising was that ABC was so
19th century about all this. The speed of light barrier? C?mon. Fortunately, the
inclusion of physicist Michio Kaku threw some cold water on this idea.
Essentially, the program came down to he said vs. she said. Wheels spinning
while the vehicle moved nowhere.
What was notably absent were the political connections. No mention of Area 51 or
S-4. No mention of black world technology. No mention of the many rumors of
alien technology and bodies. No inclusion of Apollo 14 astronaut, Dr. Edgar
Mitchell. For some time now, Dr. Mitchell has been saying publicly that elite
sources have told him about alien bodies and technology being studied at deep
levels. When a moon-walking astronaut makes such a statement, that is news
worthy.
Ultimately, by focusing on this topic as purely a matter of science, and not of
public policy or politics, the ABC special defanged a topic that is potentially
explosive. For secrecy about UFOs is potentially the most destabilizing secret
of all.
There were other subtle things going on with this special. The depictions of
Peter Davenport and Art Bell were especially interesting. Both men were shot
with lighting that accentuated their aloneness and provided an aura of
eccentricity about both of them ? out there in the middle of nowhere, so to
speak.
And what was going on with those commercials? Infomercials that sold products
for losers ? LoserWare? ? such as people who can?t flip an egg, or need help
organizing their teacups. These are the types of infomercials you expect to see
on late night cable stations, but ... Prime Time ABC? The message is clear:
people who watch UFO specials are morons.
Spin, spin, and more spin.
I do confess to wonder, however, why now? ABC could have left this issue alone.
By broaching it at all, even in this tightly controlled manner, there is the
possibility that more people will become interested to know more. There were
segments, after all, that would attract the attention of an intelligent skeptic.
The military encounters, the police encounters.
The door may have opened just a crack, and it?s always possible that events will
take an unexpected turn. The Special did not debunk UFOs, after all. At the end
of it, as I see it, anyway, the phenomenon was still standing.
I?m not sure how this will play out. My feeling is that it won?t go any further,
but I could be wrong. It is just possible that masses (that?s us) may surprise
the mighty. As a wise person said, "all revolutions are impossible ? until they
happen. Then they?re inevitable."
Professor Jim Marrs, University of Texas at Austin
University of Texas at Austin and best-selling author, Professor Jim Marrs
shares his comments and criticisms of the recent ABC News Special "UFOs: SEEING
IS BELIEVING," by Peter Jennings, aired 2-24-05
- Howdy VICTOR:
- For what it's worth, here's my contribution to the
critiques of PeterJennings' ABC special:
- The recent ABC Special "UFOs: Seeing is Believing"
was an most interesting blend of fact, fiction, information and
DISinformation.
- It appeared that ABC was trying to play catch-up.
Most of the good information was years out of date. The coverage of the
Phoenix flyover and the police chase of a UFO in the North were quite good.
But why were these "good" cases not covered as news events when they
occurred? It was as though someone in charge of ABC said, "This stuff is
already in the public domain and anyone interested in this knows about it so
we can talk about this." Or to be more blunt, ABC was mimicing the bumper
sticker that reads, "Hey wait for me! I'm your leader!"
- Yet, there were some astounding moments in the
program. After reviewing the 1950s Robertson panel and Project Bluebook,
which purported to be the last government word on UFOs, Jennings correctly
concluded that it was all hogwash. There was no scientific investigation,
only a public relations effort to stop interest in the subject. In other
words, hey America, your federal government lied to you in the 1950s and
1960s! But then Jennings turns to Roswell.
- He concludes that it was only a secret Mogul balloon
that crashed and places all the blame for later publicity on Maj. Jesse
Marcel who stirred up a number of publicity seekers. This is an atrocious
assault on a gentleman and fine military officer. One need only review
Marcel's military records to see that he was quite highly regarded. There
was no mention of the more than 400 witnesses to the Roswell event. Not all
of these people are flakes or hoaxers.
- To suppport the Mogul theory, Jennings trotted out
Karl Pflock without mentioning that Karl is CIA and a former deputy
asstistant secretary of defense. Pflock argues in his book that Mogul was so
secret that its recovery at Roswell had to be covered by a story about a
flying saucer. Now just think about this one for a moment --- a "secret"
Mogul balloon crashes and the authorities do not want Soviet agents snooping
around New Mexico. So they announce they have recovered a flying saucer?!!
Every agent in the world would flock to NM!
- He also points out that more than half the Mogul
ballons launched were never recovered. Why not? No one bothered to go look
for them, he tells us. Some Top-Secret project, eh? If the Mogul balloons
were to detect Soviet nuclear testing in the atmosphere as claimed, it has
never been adaquately explained why they were launched from New Mexico
instead of US bases in Turkey or Japan.
- The 1997 official Air Force explanation of crash
dummies was not even mentioned by Jennings. This is probably due to the fact
that the government's own documents clearly show the very first crash dummy
test was not until June, 1954.
- Both Jennings and their scientific "experts" all came
down on the fact that not one piece of physical evidence has been made
public to verify the UFO phenomena. Yet there was not a whisper concerning
the massive amount of evidence, both documentary and narrative, that this
maddening lack of physical evidence can be directly tied to government crash
retrieval programs designed to appropriate such evidence and hide it away.
If I take a quarter from you and place it in my pocket, then claimthat I do
not have a quarter, how can you "prove" that I do without emptying my
pocket. We cannot empty the government's pocket.
- So the Jennings special ended up all about lights in
the sky which admittedly is the weakest evidence supporting the reality of
UFOs. He brushed aside the abduction phenomenon as a sleep disorder and
never mentioned the peer-reviewed work of the late Harvard psychologist Dr.
John Mack. And there was no mention whatsoever of crop circles, animal
mutiliations or the numerous cases involving physical effects on both people
and property.
- Jennings instead speant an inordinate amount of time
of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) in which radio
signals are beamed into space hoping for a reply. While most UFO researchers
support the SETI propram, they also question the use of primitive radio
signals to contact a technologically-advanced alien civilization. What if I
sent a Morse Code message by AM radio signal to your house? Would you even
receive it on the new sophisticated digital receivers? Would you be
listening for it? And could you understand it if you did receive it? I know
I have long forgotten the Morse Code I learned in the Boy Scouts.
- For all of this, the upshot of the Jenning special
was encouraging. Yes, they debunked Roswell but they admitted that the
government lied to us about UFOs in the '50s and '60s, a period many of us
still remember. They pooh-poohed alien abductions yet showed sobering
personal testimony from some unidentified persons. The personal narratives
presented were riveting and compelling and undoubtedly stirred some interest
in that portion of the public still in denial about life outside the Earth.
- Most importantly, ABC, a major Establishment news
outlet, actually addressed the UFO issue without the usual smug and
condescending attitudes which marked earlier efforts. The door to serious
discussion and study of UFOs may have cracked open a bit. This may be yet
another step forward in the 50-year program to condition the American public
to the reality of the UFOs.
- Professor JIM MARRS
- www.jimmarrs.com/
-
From UFOUpdates:
--------------
Review of Peter Jennings Report on UFOs
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2005/feb/m25-022.shtml
Peter Jennings ABC special:
The definitive special about alien life ...has yet to be made.
by Will Bueche
John E. Mack Institute
Peter Jennings' report on UFOs was awaited with much excitement by people such
as myself who have an interest in the subject of alien contact - excitement
which was only partially tempered by the unfortunate news that the final
interview given by Harvard's Dr. John Mack, a leading authority on the subject
of alien contact, would not be presented in the finished program. Still, the
potential for a powerful program remained, due to the high quality work which
Peter Jennings Productions are known for. I duly tuned in the broadcast this
evening.
It seems that the best of what Peter Jennings Productions (and the filmmakers at
Springs Media) delivered was a strong 20 or 30 minute introduction to the UFO
subject, and then (much later in
the program) an all-too-brief couple of minutes of modern perspectives on how
alien visitation could be possible (from internationally recognized authority in
theoretical physics Dr. Michio Kaku). The first segment persuasively argued that
early investigations of flying saucers on the part of the Air Force or
government were so weak as to be considered a squandered opportunity for
knowledge. But from that segment on, the program seemed rather uninspired. If
the program had taken the lead of modern scientists such as Dr. Michio Kaku or
Brian Greene this program could have been a grand statement about the current
theories and ideas about ufos/alien encounters, and how we might investigate
them if we apply this modern knowledge. I refer to knowledge which - as anyone
who has looked into alien encounters would appreciate -involves theoretical
physics' insights into the structure of reality as well as theories of
consciousness or, to put it more simply, theories of how perception of reality
is affected by different states of consciousness.
Instead, modernity was given a couple minutes of limelight (in the form of Dr.
Kaku explaining how modern physics believes that seemingly vast distances
between worlds could be crossed in an instant) followed by people who are
retreading theories of the 1970s - including present day researchers who are
parroting theories from that era (the people from SETI, Harvard's Dr. McNally,
and - to be entirely fair - even some "pro" ufo folks).
If only Jennings' program had been as fascinated by contemporary theories as
they were by the early days of the UFO era. It was evidently not to be, and
therefore this special was itself an opportunity squandered.
Sadly, the definitive special about alien life has yet to be made.
Viewers Respond
Reaction to the Peter Jennings Special, sampled from the web:
"...thank god for the Dr. Kaku segment; as he said, I believe most of our
skeptics are only thinking 100 years in the future; not 1 million. The arrogance
[of some scientists who] think we know the way the universe works is amazing to
me - especially because science has been revised and proven wrong so many times
in the past. Considering the age of the universe, why would we assume that any
race near us would be as young as we are? And using radio waves for god's sake?"
"John Mack, whose interview was cut, was sorely missed here as plenty of
abduction stuff was offered up, only to be coolly dismissed by pretty Dr.
Clancy, with little or no rebuttal or debate presented."
"...the 'experts' have that haughtiness that indicates they think they know what
is going on in the universe. Well, nobody knows. I'm inclined to think that what
actually is going on is so bizarre that any one of us would be hard pressed to
believe it [unless it] were it presented to us in a way we would
understand -- an unlikely prospect in itself. There's likely more to it than we
can imagine."
"I was left with the feeling that [Jennings] wants the audience to give the
topics serious consideration, and that scientists should give it serious study."
"It seems as if a number of the Scientists, Psychologists, Psychiatrists and
others interviewed for these and similar topic shows pound the drum of the
fallibility of memory and the concept that the mind is weak storage device
because everything is filtered through perception and that the information
within is prone to be rewritten and edited over time. To some extent I believe
that most would agree this is true, but I hardly believe this means that memory
should never be trusted. After all, some
folks put these little PhDs, MDs, and other markers of learned knowledge behind
their names, which I would assume, means they don?t doubt their own experience,
suggest that we should trust their memory, and what they say should somehow hold
some weight because of the memory of their past educational experience, which is
somehow immune to be rewritten or edited. Is that faulty logic? Are these two
different concepts?"
"It's easy to tell the smart people from the dumb people. Compare some of those
skeptics on the show with their smirks and blank eyes to the bright light of
Michio Kaku's eyes and his clear passion for learning and physics. I think there
are really two kinds of people in the world - those who are fascinated by the
universe and what it might contain, and those who want to just plain contain it
within a predetermined idea structure."
Jennings Blinded By Skepticism Ignorant Or What?
William Hand
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2005/feb/m25-004.shtml
The Peter Jennings UFO special on ABC was overall very under researched, very
narrow-minded, quite short in length, and barely touched the tip of the iceburn
when it comes to the most stunning evidence that extraterrestrials are visiting
our planet.
Countless extraordinary cases were not even mentioned by this program. Instances
where nuclear missles were remotely turned off by UFOs, in which UFOs were
captured by the space shuttle, instances where energy pulses were seen shooting
at these UFOs in orbit, even other cases in which craft were captured on radar
while being chased by jets, the numerous Mexico City sightings of the 1990's to
present day, the UFOs encounted by the Belgium Air Force that were seen by so
many, the Kecksburg case, the Rendalsham Forest incident, many high level
government/military witnesses to the coverup, and so many other important
aspects to the UFO phenomenon were not even considered!
For goodness sakes, the entire MJ-12 issue was not even discussed!
Additionally, skeptics were given lots of time to talk but Ufologists that could
have easily refuted their claims (like the Pheonix lights were just flares) were
not even interviewed. Also, they did not even interview city council woman
Francis Barwood who went on a single person _crusade_ to get to the truth about
the Pheonix lights only to have the Governer of Arizona announce an emergency
press conference to bring out two of his goons dressed in kooky alien costumes
to try and belittle all the eye witnesses who saw a huge solid object. His quote
was, "You guy's need to stop taking this stuff so seriously."
However, what _really_ upset me the most was his complete bashing and debunking
of the Roswell UFO crash. Instead of doing any real research into Roswell he
basically refused to question anything the Airforce said, labeled all Roswell
researchers as "gold diggers", claimed that no one can be certain if Jesse
Marcel was even telling the truth, and that all new witnesses were frauds that
were just jumping on the bandwagon!
Here are a few of Peter Jennings quotes from the show or at least as close as I
can remember them:
"The myth of Roswell."
"There is not a shred of credible evidence that an alien ship
crashed."
"There are no credible witnesses of bodies."
"There was lots of money to be made, but your book had to have even more
grandious claims than the previous one."
"Many more witnesses came out of the woodwork to jump on the bandwagon."
"They (speaking of anyone who believes roswell was the crash of an alien space
craft) cling to a myth that in Roswell the answer to alien life was answered,
but it was _not_!"
Peter Jennings complete and utter contempt for even the possibility of an alien
space craft crashing at Roswell clearly shows during the segment. Additionally,
he disrespects witnesses by basically ignoring all of them and not mentioning
one name other than Jesse Marcel (and briefly his son) which he gives no
signifiance and in a way even belittles.
The _truth_ of the matter is that there are many credible witnesses of the
Roswell incident, they came from all walks of life (from rancher Mac Brazel all
the way to general Author Exon), all have unique perspectives to the event, and
show something _extraordinary_ happened that could NOT have been any type of
weather balloon, mogul balloon, or even a string of weather balloons.
Want to read about these witnesses? Then read the statements of many, many
witnesses to the Roswell Incident at the following internet address:
http://www.roswellproof.com
Does he need some more evidence that Roswell happened?
Well too bad he did not take the time to zoom in on the telegraph that was in
General Ramey's hand while he posed for photos infront of the switched weather
balloon _junk_! If Peter Jennings had bothered to zoom into that letter (he
showed the general non-zoomed photo during the special) he could have almost
clearly read the following:
"AND THE VICTIMS OF THE WRECK IN THE DISC WE WILL SHIP" among other readable
portions of the telegraph!
Wanna read it for yourself? Go to the great website of David Rudiak at:
http://www.roswellproof.com and take a
look!
An incident involving nothing more than a mere weather balloons (that would have
been easily identifiable by Jesse Marcel and everyone else on base without
question) would not have
_victims_, that apparently were harmed by a _wreck_, and would be shipped in a
_disc_! Peter Jennings ignored and basically refused to even mention the
testimony of _numerous_ witnesses to the Roswell Incident. But one that he did
not mention, in particular, really ticks me off! The name is Col. Philip J.
Corso co-author of, "The Day After Roswell." Col. Corso was as solid and
credible of a witness as you could find. He was a decorated military officer and
had a military career that many would dream of having. His testimony is
basically two fold:
1) In 1947 while on watch at a military base he came across a couple large
crates that were under high security. After another soldier had reported taking
a peak he opened them and saw two very bizzare bodies of what he would later
realize were EBEs or extraterrestrial biological entities from the Roswell
Craft.
2) In the 1960's he was assigned to the Foriegn technology division of the
pentagon. The general that was his supervisor gave him access to a filing
cabinet that contained photos, documents, sketches, debris samples, and all
kinds of info on the crash of an ET space craft outside of Roswell NM.
Col. Philip J. Corso before his death signed sworn affidavits to the above,
wrote his book about his experiences (that Senator Strom Thurmond wrote the
forward to _knowing_ full well what the
content was about, but then when his staff realized what he did they ordered it
be yanked), gave many interviews about the above events, and went on the radio
to tell the world of what he saw, read, and knew.
No one in the military, not one living soul, has officially declared him to have
lied, misled anyone, or even to have hallucinated the whole story.
Peter Jennings _completely_ and totally ignored Col. Corso's testimony!
Obviously, if Peter Jennings had done any _real_ research into Roswell they
would have discovered his book, his testimony, and his sworn affidavits. But
obviously they brushed his testimony under the rug just like they did _every_
single other witness to Roswell (except Marcel and his son). I highly urge
everyone to read the book, The Day After Roswell, and read yourself about the
man that Peter Jennings did not want the world to hear about!
Another part of this UFO special that I found repugnant was his obvious lack of
research into new physics research that could allow for FTL travel, allow for
gravity manipulation, alter the properties of inertia itself, and extract
unlimited energy from the vacumm to allow for ET's to travel basically anywhere
they want (without having to harness the power of entire stars).
Want to read more about the above?
Then why don't you read up on websites such as....
Tom Bearden's website at
http://www.cheniere.org
or
American Antigravity at
http://www.americanantigravity.com
Yes, they talked about wormholes... big deal! People are working on devices that
tap energy from the vacumm, manipulate gravity itself for propulsion, and even
generate beams of gravity to retract or push away objects. Want to learn more
and read the scientific abstracts about these experiments? Go to the above
sites!
To sum it up, this UFO special was nothing special at all. Peter Jennings showed
his true colors to the world by following the Air Force's line and refusing to
even look at the Roswell witnesses (the many credible witnesses and of course
Col. Corso), repeatedly calling those who seriously study UFOs "true believers",
refused to look at the telegraph in Ramey's hand, ignored so many of the amazing
incidents that have occured in the UFO phenomenon, and only reported a small
handful of not even the best cases indicating ET's are visiting our planet.
He took a cursory glance at UFOs, towed the mainstream party line on the entire
subject, refused to admit any type of coverup, refused to take a solid position
himself other than just saying he remains skeptical, and ignored one very
important principle.
If you have a thousand or a million black crows and then find one white crow you
have just PROVEN that not all crows are black.
I have a VERY important question for Peter Jennings:
How many different people, military officers, radar systems, pilots, space
shuttle cameras, satellites, and even whole cities will have to report seeing or
one step further even taking images of white crows until you are willing to
believe that not all crows are black and take a firm position on this issue?!
Perhaps Peter Jennings is a true skeptic at heart, perhaps he is just ignorant
of the vast majority of UFO data, or maybe this show was all he was allowed by
the powers that be to raise public awareness of these issues.
It is even possible that Peter Jennings knows more and accepts more than he
presented on the program.
But overall, the show was not much of special, and in my opinion did little to
advanced the cause of exposing the truth about ETs visiting our planet.
I ask once more... When will you admit to a _white_ crow, Mr. Jennings?
William Hand
ABC Jennings Special
Bruce Maccabee
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2005/feb/m25-001.shtml
The first segment was weighted positive by the number of witnesses.
Unfortunately they combined the "8 o'clock hour" events over Phoenix (triangle)
with th 10 PM videos that probably show flares, as described on my web site.
The astronomer guy clearly didn't know anything about the 8:30 PM triangle or
else simply ignored all that testimony in favor of commenting only upon the
:"lights in the sky" that were videod at 10 PM.
Kudos to Michio for pulling our theoretical irons out of the fire. Oddly enough,
he was saying what is in the recently published "Inflation" paper mentioned
previously on this List: we ought to examine UFO sightings on the off chance
that one or more might actually be evidence of a far advanced civilization.
As Kaku said: "Let the investigation begin."
Too bad Jenning disparaged Roswell (all a bunch of people trying to make a buck)
and tried to make abductions look like nonsense (all mental, dreams). No
reference to abductions while the witness was doing something other than
sleeping.
Kudos to all the witnesses and investigators. This show will probably cause a
number of people to come forward with their own reports.
Bruce Maccabee
From: BILL HAMILTON, UFO researcher
-----------------------------------------
Subject: "UFOs: SEEING IS BELIEVING AND NOT SEEING IS BELIEVING!"
Dear Friends,
Last night I watched Peter Jenning's present his ABC Special and have already
seen statements made by some UFO researchers and would like to express my
opinion. BTW, I have not seen how yet to provide feedback to ABC, but an email
campaign might be in order.
1. Recent sightings - fairly good presentation with convincing witness
testimony.
2. Early sightings - Not too bad. Military pilot testimony very interesting.
3. Phoenix Lights sightings - good witness testimony, but now I see who they
interviewed when I was told they wanted to interview me, but went to Tucson for
a real expert (gag!). James McGaha is an arch skeptic, but his explanations are
like leaky balloons which fall to the ground. His explanation of 5 airplanes
instead of 1 large object with 5 lights came from one eyewitness, a dubious
young man named Mitch Stanley who said he saw 5 airplanes in formation on the
night of March 13th through his Dobsonian telescope. No one else saw these 5
airplanes. As for the flares, I will not waste your
time on that.
4. Roswell - BIG FLUNK on this one. Maybe Peter Jennings did want to delve into
that bag as he did not want to incur flashback from politicos. Karl Pflock got
in more than his 2 cents and Stanton -- oh, we did not hear any rebuttal from
Stanton. The Mogul balloon explanation that the Air Force dug out of its handy
dandy files has been thoroughly discredited by any researcher worth his salt,
but Pflock backs the Air Force: Roswell, Case Closed. HA! Anything but closed.
5. Majestic 12 and the cover up - well, the impression is that anyone who
believes this is a conspiracy theorists. Check into how Jennings dealt with the
JFK assasination. Just the straight poppycock and pamblum for the viewers -- no
real insight here.
6. Abductions -- The abductees did well in telling a little of their stories,
but the lasting impression given by the two psychologists with their opinion of
hypnosis and sleep paralysis without rebuttal from Hopkins or another
professional (John Mack not shown - too bad we lost him). Their statements made
my wife angry and she said, "they should be taken". No fair and balanced
reporting here.
7. Space Travel - I don't want to hear one more time "they can't get here from
there", the distances are insuperable, or it is so incredibly difficult. Thank
God Dr. Michio Kaku offset this with his positive and upbeat statements on
wormhole travel.
8. Astrobiologists - Chris McKay made an outstanding statement saying that his
only difference from those who believe UFOs represent the existence of ET life
is that he prefers looking for material evidence, but was actually quite
friendly with his remarks.
9. SETI scientists - what is with these guys? We are not trying to fight a turf
war with them. And what were they doing on a show with a UFO focus? Give them
their own damn show. The time they took to make their case could be given to
CE-5 cases as defined by Dr. Richard Haines -- cases involving signaling UFOs
and receiving responses such as I did when I was a naive teenager.
Conclusion: UFO researchers should team up and produce their own television
special and make it a mini-series. Anyone who can donate the dollars would be
welcome as long as we are free to present our case for the UFO.
Well, I hope that it raised public awareness. That is the least it could do.
Respectfully yours,
Bill Hamilton
AstroScience Research Network
http://www.astrosciences.info/
"I don't see the logic of rejecting data just because they seem incredible."
Fred Hoyle
ABC - A First Reaction From Outside Ufology
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/2005/feb/m25-005.shtml
I'm not a Ufologist, per se, but merely a Fortean researcher and writer. So I
watched _the_ program, anyway, out of curiosity and to see how ABC News dealt
with this subject. My first reactions:
Very well-done. High production values, not sensationalized, and quite
intelligent.
Peter Jennings' UFO special created a decent overview of the ufological
phenomena, I thought, for the general public. First a few quick grabber moments
with recent cases of triangles over Phoenix and southern Illinois, with Coast to
Coast AM's Art Bell (but why no credit to George Noory?). Then some good
historical material, with great down-to-earth commentary by Jerome Clark and
others. Pilots' sightings, J. Allen Hynek, and more pro-UFO material filled the
first hour.
When hour two opened, I thought the good cop-bad cop split was going to occur.
And indeed, for a time, it was nothing but skepticism, from SETI people and
astronomers. Then the "myth" of
Roswell was retold, with lots of funny visuals and a bit of media bias in the
voice-overs. Stan Friedman and Karl Pflock were given good moments to detail
their thoughts. This was followed by a segment delivered, with a careful
introduction from Jenning, on abductees and Bud Hopkins, who was portrayed as
the "first one out of the gate" on this subject. Unmentioned, let's hope Betty
and Barney Hill and John Fuller, please, are resting in peace. Whitley
Strieber's book cover was shown as one of those tomes coming after Hopkins. I'm
outside the feuds of the field, but I could feel the sparks flying already. And
then the whole thing ended with some thoughtful insights on space travel from
physicist Michio Kaku.
All in all, an excellent addition to the documentary attempts to address the
question of UFOs.
Sincerely,
Loren Coleman
http://www.lorencoleman.com
From: Abductions@aol.com
"Where Was John Mack?" Peter Jennings UFO ABC Special
------------------------------------------
Hello Everyone who saw the UFO Special:
While many of us would have appreciated seeing John Mack's work mentioned and
his rebuttal of the sleep paralysis theories, this UFO documentary was produced
by the ABC News department. The program was intended for a mainstream audience
that was basically unaware of what UFO activity was all about.
Rather than wail on the wall over why didn't ABC include this one or that one,
we need to recognize and appreciate the fact that one of our favorite topics was
given 2 hours of prime time coverage on national television. If done correctly,
this national exposure could spur the general public into demanding more
information from the government about the UFO cover-up which is a common goal we
all share.
I agree with John Brandenburg's remarks and hope someone forwards my e-mail to
him. His comments about the "Yo Yo" astronomers were right on target, for which
he could have included the SETI Siamese-scientists who could not tell a moon in
the clouds from a star. . . which made me think
it was time to yank their federal funding, unless of course, they are the modern
day version of Project Blue Book, exisiting only to de-bunk alien contact.
The ABC documentary also stated at the beginning that all animations were
approved by their witnesses. Another key point to appreciate is the way ABC
chose to feature Air Force pilots, trained in knowing what commercial and test
aircraft look like, to describe their aerial encounters with UFOs.
This then, alerted the viewer to the fact the re-enactments were based on visual
testimony of the pilots and others. Reports from Air Force pilots and law
enforcement personnel hold more credence than listening to stories from people
living in the country about lights in the sky, which is why so much of the
program centered on uniformed witnesses.
For that matter, ABC instead could have selected that Thursday evening time slot
to feature actresses dresses for the upcoming Academy Awards on Sunday night -
as the other networks have already done. I for one am grateful for ABC News to
have put UFOs ahead of the Academy Award dresses!
MARILYN RUBEN
Alien Abduction Experience and Research
www.abduct.com
----------------------------------------
Subject: "Where Was John Mack? Peter Jennings UFO ABC Special"
Col John Alexander
APOLLINAIR@aol.com wrote:
Program was very weak. I know they had an interview with John Mack before he was
killed. There is much better evidence than eyewitness testimony, though you
would not know it from this program. In fact, they should have dropped the whole
abduction segment and added physical evidence.
JOHN ALEXANDER
(Col ret. US Army, author of several books, e.g. "Future War" expert in
non-lethal weapons at Los Alamos & UFOs at NIDS)
-----------------------------------------
From: Kae Geller
jimmyclothespin@yahoo.com
Subject: "UFOs: LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE," Thursday, Feb 24, 8-10 pm, ABC
VICTOR:
I thought there was nothing new on the show that hasn't already been on the
DISCOVERY CHANNEL... except for MICHIO KAKU who is wonderful. Now a 2-hour
special on Michio Kaku discussing cosmology would be marvelous.
To intentionally omit Dr. John Mack's work (and he is the only researcher of
alien abduction with a medical degree in psychiatry, as opposed to some
psychologists (the very ones from Harvard who were trying to get rid of him) and
a well intentioned painter, is not character assassination
but obliteration.
In my mind, the purging of Dr. Mack's significant
work, just a few months after his untimely death, is alarming. I will not sit
back and be fed the same pablum in ultra close ups
while significant DISINFORMATION is afoot.
Keep the debate alive. Thanks for reading and
watching.
Best,
KAE GELLER
Click here
to read compilation of comments by COAST TO COAST AM Listeners
Peter Jennings' ABC News
special on UFOs claims that almost 50% of Americans believe that UFOs are
real and millions of people worldwide have had UFO sightings. Even President
Jimmy Carter
publicly admitted seeing a UFO in 1969, as per ABC News and
CNN (see CNN fact box).
When elected in 1977, Carter took this issue seriously enough to further
investigate it. Through his work as a futurist at the Stanford Research
Institute, Alfred Lambremont Webre directed a proposed extraterrestrial
communication study project for the Carter White House. This study was
cancelled by the Pentagon who said 'there are no UFOs'.
Today, millions of people know that there are UFOs. Even high level government
officials don't believe that there are no UFOs. As
reported by CNN, in November 2002, John Podesta, President Clinton's former
White House Chief of Staff, did a press conference asking the Pentagon to
release the top secret information they have about UFOs. The question is:
"what does the UFO issue mean to politics and the process of setting national
and international government policies?" This is the reason why Mr. Webre
founded the field of exopolitics, with the purpose of creating a grassroots
campaign to address such questions. He supports peaceful space exploration,
especially
NASA's program focused on searching for life on planet Mars.
Webre's book "Exopolitics - Politics,
Government and Law in the Universe" may turn the dominant view of our
Universe upside down. It reveals that we live on an isolated planet in the midst
of a populated, evolving, and highly organized inter-planetary, inter-galactic,
and multi-dimensional Universe society. It explores why Earth appears to have
been quarantined for eons from a more evolved Universe society. It also suggests
specific steps to end our isolation and proposes ways to communicate with the
technologically and spiritually advanced civilizations that are engaging our
world at this unique time in human history.
Mr. Webre's unprecedented book, "Exopolitics - Politics, Government and Law in
the Universe" is being published in March 2005. To learn more, visit:
www.universebooks.com. Mr. Webre will be officially launching his book at
the 2nd Annual Exopolitics Conference in Washington, DC, in April 2005:
http://www.paradigmclock.com/X-Conference/speakers.htm
EXOPOLITICS: POLITICS, GOVERNMENT AND LAW IN THE UNIVERSE (Universebooks 2005)
by
Alfred Lambremont Webre, J.D., M.Ed. with Forewords by
Dr. Courtney Brown of the Farsight Institute and
Paul Davids, Executive Producer of ROSWELL.
Available at Universebooks.com.
February 27, 2005 at 01:01 PM |
Permalink
-------------------------
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1908455
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference
DID YOU WATCH PETER JENNINGS' CHUM-TV/ABC-TV NEWS PRIMETIME SPECIAL ON UFOS? A
GATHERING OF EXOPOLITICAL COMMENTARY.:
------------------------------
Comments:
My Email To Peter Jennings
Hi Mr. Jennings,
If you want the complete story about who the visiting aliens are, what they are
doing here, and why the government HAS to keep it all secret, check out all the
pages on my website at:
http://antigray.tripod.com/
My book that covers it all is available at:
http://www.booklocker.com/books/1417.html
History of alien interference with humanity, and a beneficial solution.
Barnes &Noble:
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=yH7TzuyAca&isbn=1591133580&itm=1
My take on "UFOs - Seeing Is Believing," is that the main thrust of the show
seemed to be touting that people were "believing," almost in the religious
sense, like the witnesses are believing something and going off the deep end
because they have misidentified it. The good thing about the show was the highly
credible military and police UFO witnesses. Unfortunately the same old
"believers versus skeptics" name calling that has been going on for 50 years
reared its ugly head. At least it will make the public think about it all a
little bit. But then the show featured a scientist who came on and said science
does not accept proof from eyewitnesses! The military eyewitnesses and Dr. Hynek
are professionals who don't mistake planets for fast moving alien craft. There
is also physical evidence from UFOs that can be scientifically measured. The
gist of what the skepi-scientist was saying was that if any evidence was
observed by civilians it meant nothing. What the show did not mention is that
there has been tons of physical evidence generated by UFO landings and alien
abductions. The ground that UFOs were observed to have landed on usually shows
anomalous characteristics for example, many of which were SCIENTIFICALLY
EXAMINED by Dr. J. Allen Hynek himself, a scientist with an impeccable
reputation who was PAID by the government to debunk the evidence. Being a good
scientist, he found evidence he could not debunk because it was valid evidence
that something extraordinary had occurred.
Check it out:
Physical Trace Cases
Physical trace reports were labeled Close Encounters of the Second Kind
(CE-II) by J.Allen Hynek and involve instances where there was a physical
interaction between the UFO and its environment. Usually these involve a landing
trace, such as depressed grass or soil, but also burned or broken vegetation,
residues, and more exotic traces. There are at least somewhere between 3,500 and
5,000 UFO physical trace cases.
Read these cases at:
http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/physicaltracecases.htm
Then there is the physical evidence recovered from abductees such as alien
implants. They were removed by Dr Roger Leir, another man of science.
http://alienscalpel.com/
Typical example:
http://www.alienscalpel.com/roger/p4.html
Will other scientists now disparage the scientific investigations of these
good scientists to protect their rinky dink jobs which will become outmoded? No
point in clinging to buggy whip science when we already have Faster Than Light (FTL)
travel accomplished, huh? Oh, yes, that information comes from Ben Rich,
engineer extraordinaire and head of Lockheed's Skunkworks.
Check it out:
ET Vehicles and Time Travel Technology by Linda Moulton Howe
March 26, 2004 Lancaster, California -
Twenty-one years ago on April 9, 1983, I was at Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque,
New Mexico, interviewing an Air Force Office of Special Investigations Agent
named Richard C. Doty. I was working on a documentary special for Home Box
Office entitled, UFOs: The E.T. Factor. During that meeting, Richard Doty handed
me several typed pages as he said, "My superiors have asked me to show this to
you. You can read the document and ask me questions, but you can't take
notes." The top page said in all capitols centered on the page:
BRIEFING PAPER FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ON THE SUBJECT OF UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAVs)
The paper summarized more than half a dozen crash retrievals of what were
referred to as "extraterrestrial" aerial vehicles from a variety of locations in
New Mexico, Arizona and even the nation of Mexico. The paper also referred to
extraterrestrial entities, both dead and alive, retrieved from those crashed
aerial vehicles and specified two kinds: small, grey beings and another kind
simply referred to as "The Talls" in the briefing paper. When I asked Doty if
the "Talls" were the blond types also known as "Nordics," he said yes.
.
The last page of the briefing paper had a list of projects that included Project
Aquarius. Aquarius was described as an effort to study all extraterrestrial
technology, to try to back engineer it and apply what was learned to America's
own space program. While I was trying to produce that Home Box Office special, I
was told by a number of sources that the retrieved extraterrestrial craft were
controlled by the minds of the ET pilots through head and hand devices.
.
I was also told that the craft were not assembled the way we do airplanes with
metal sheeting and rivets. The solid silver disks were said to be grown as we
would a crystal from solution. Further, I was told our government had retrieved
one or more ET devices which "capture time and play it back." When I said,
"Isn't that what we do when we film or videotape?" Doty said, "No, it's my
nderstanding that the ET technology literally can replay back segments of time
lines." I was also told that the ETs could travel in time.
Now, twenty-one years after that Kirtland AFB meeting, I and several others from
a variety of backgrounds are meeting at the Hilton Washington Hotel in
Gaithersburg, Maryland for the First Exopolitics X-Conference about testimonies
and evidence that indicate one or more non-human intelligences interact with
Earth life, past and present. I will be speaking about the U. S. government's
strict policy of denial about all extraterrestrial matters in the interest of
national security a policy with punishment to back it up since at least the
Truman Administration. I will also be presenting a workshop about the
extraordinary layered bismuth and magnesium metal pieces that Art Bell and I
first discussed on Coast to Coast AM radio back in 1996 which allegedly came
from the bottom of a wedge-shaped craft -not a disk - retrieved on the northern
White Sands Missile Range northwest of Roswell in 1947.
One of the biggest questions is how successful have American efforts to
back-engineer extraterrestrial technologies been? The speaker who will address
that question at the X-Conference is William Hamilton, Executive Director of
Skywatch International, who works full time as a computer programmer analyst at
the University of California Los Angeles. Bill has devoted his private time over
the past several years to accumulating testimonies from half a dozen engineers
and other scientists about back engineering efforts, both of physical aircraft
design and what are called "biomorphing technologies."
An important source for some of this information was Ben Rich, head of Lockheed
Corporation's famous "Skunk Works" for 16 years which concentrated on research
and development of Top Secret special projects concerning aerial craft such as
the F-117A and other advanced technologies.
MIND CONTROLLED ET CRAFT & ET TIME TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY
Interview:
Bill Hamilton, Computer Programmer Analyst, University of California-Los
Angeles, and Executive Director of Skywatch, Lancaster, California: "He (Ben
Rich) was showing slides and the last slide he showed looked like a black disk
coming up from the Earth and going into space. And at that point, he said to the
audience: 'We now have the technology to take ET home.' That's quite a
statement. A person sitting there who heard this was Jan Hartzan. He is a senior
project manager at Boeing. He's also a graduate of the UCLA School of
Engineering. And he's also Director of MUFON Orange County over here in
California.
I thought that was significant because it definitely confirms that
reverse-engineering (has occurred) I mean, when you take Ben Rich's statement
and his character, his background, it is nearly unassailable.
WAS HE PHYSICALLY ALLOWED TO SEE AND ENTER AN ET CRAFT AT AREA 51?
No, but he did make the statements that the (extraterrestrial craft) were
real, and positive statements that we had that technology now could only mean
that he was so involved that he had to have firsthand hands-on type of
experience. Why else would he make such statements?
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT IS HARDER THAT WOULD ASSOCIATE HIM HAVING FIRSTHAND
EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY?
Just statements that he made to the engineers. For instance, they discovered
that one of their equations was wrong and it was corrected, that we could
travel at extremely high rates of speed to the stars and that was not a barrier.
Statements like this where would those statements (come from?) He is basing
those statements on technology that he knows was developed.
THE IMPLICATION WAS THAT OUR GOVERNMENT ACTIVELY HAD ALREADY IN OPERATION CRAFT
FROM SOME PLACE ELSE AND THAT WE WERE GOING TO THIS SOME PLACE ELSE?
He didn't actually say we were going. He said we have the capacity to go.
Why wouldn't we?
IN BILL UHOUSE'S STORY, HE WAS ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN BACK-ENGINEERING OF
SOMETHING IN THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTEXT, RIGHT?
Yes, he was involved in the simulators. The simulators were built according
to Bill Uhouse so that our pilots could learn how to fly these craft. They are
not jet aircraft.
Mind Controlled ET Craft
WHEN BILL UHOUSE TALKED WITH YOU ABOUT BEING INVOLVED IN SIMULATORS TO TEACH
HUMANS HOW TO FLY EXTRATERRESTRIAL CRAFT, WHAT EXACTLY DID HE SAY HE WAS DEALING
WITH IN SIMULATIONS?
We cannot use the methods that the extraterrestrials use to control their
craft because they do a mind/body interface with the craft. But installing our
own means, our own avionics, that our pilots trained on our own avionics, would
be able to control the flight of these craft.
NOT WITH THOSE BANDS AROUND THEIR HEADS THAT COL. CORSO AND OTHERS HAVE
DESCRIBED, BUT SOME ADAPTATION OF LITERAL ET TECHNOLOGY?
Yes, and in fact, I think they did try the headbands as far as picking up
the brain waves of the pilots and amplifying those.
WHAT HAPPENED?
I believe that what happened that they have learned that the pilots could
not control their thinking processes, could not control their intentions the way
the ETs could. Therefore, it was not a very reliable method for them to use.
Does American Government Have ET Time Travel Technology?
WHAT IS THE MOST SHOCKING OR ASTONISHING THING THAT YOU HAVE HEARD FROM PEOPLE
WORKING ON BACK ENGINEERING EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY?
That we have time machines, in secret. But see, that is not something I can
verify. I mean, it's testimony and I try to listen for similar testimony,
right, from independent sources. But it's like that's what we are left with.
It's like when somebody gives testimony that they have sighted a UFO. We have
testimony. If we have some documents, maybe we have gone a little further.
BUT TIME MACHINES WOULD BE PURELY SOME ONE ELSE'S TECHNOLOGY, NOT HUMAN MADE?
The person who related this information, a physicist, related that
information went to repair one of the time machines. And he knew somewhat how it
worked. He did not know how it was developed, or where it came from, or the
source of the engineering, or whether it was reverse-engineered, or anything
like
that.
IF WE ARE DEALING WITH TIME AND WE HAVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS THAT CAN GET US TO
OTHER SOLAR SYSTEMS, AS BEN RICH IMPLIED, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT
IS STILL KEEPING EVERYBODY IN THE DARK?
I may know why, but I can't say. Again, it's one of those conundrums. I
mean, the answer makes sense to me. I cannot verify it as the truth. It's like
this: if I were to get in front of a large audience and ask, 'Would you
recognize the truth if I told you?' Of course, if it is something very strange,
I don't
think they would. There is no way that I could let's say for a minute that I
was an insider and I was to disclose the truth about what is going on that
anybody would have any means of immediately verifying it just on my words alone.
So, that's the conundrum."
http://www.etfriends.com/conference/addinfo/howe.html
=====================================
Mr. Jennings, did you know that if you or your staff had dug a little deeper,
you could have proved the Roswell UFO crash did happen just from the photos you
had in hand on the show? The famous series of photos of General Ramey at the
press conference bending over debris from a weather balloon and saying that is
what really crashed is the key. The 1947 photos were taken with an old Graflex
press camera that used large photographic plates to capture the photo images.
Two teams of professional researchers 3 years ago got the original photos and
negatives from the Ft. Worth, Texas newspaper's archives. The researchers used
computer enhancement to zoom in on the telegram that Gen. Ramey was holding in
his hand. I have those photos in my book including the text of the telegram. The
telegram was from the Pentagon and it was detailed orders telling what was to be
done with the saucer debris and the alien bodies they had recovered. I have the
zoomed in picture of the telegram in my book and all of the reconstructed text:
"Warning" by Art Greenfield
ISBN: 1-59113-358-0
Copyright ? 2004 by Art Greenfield
All rights reserved
http://www.booklocker.com/books/1417.htm
You can order the ebook version of the book and download it immediately onto
your computer and see the telegram text and photos.
Mr. Jennings, you had the smoking gun right under your nose and never knew it.
If you had only asked Art Bell where was the proof of Roswell, you could have
found out about the "smoking telegram." The researchers revealed all of the
information about that telegram on Art Bell's show.
If you have any questions please ask. Do you think your audience can handle the
truth? Also check out Grant Cameron's Presidential UFO site (See below).
Sincrely,
Art Greenfield
antigray@cs.com
Note:
We already had a presidential candidate who promised to reveal everything to the
public that the government knew about UFOs and aliens if he got elected. It was
Jimmy Carter. Once he was elected president, he was not allowed to say a word
about the subject to the public. I know. I was personally involved in bringing
out on the Larry King Live Show just what President Carter HAD privately told
someone he trusted.
Here is what happened. I was written up in Filer's Files about it:
PRESIDENT CARTER TELLS SHIRLEY MACLAINE ABOUT UFOs
Donald Ratsch writes, according to a Larry King Show, Shirley Maclaine revealed
that former President Carter told her about UFO crashes and alien bodies. The
transcript of this exchange started with a caller from Cocoa, Florida. Larry
King says, ?Cocoa Florida with Shirley Maclaine, hello." Caller responds,
"Hello, Good evening Larry and Shirley, About two weeks ago, Nicholas Cage was
on the Letterman Show and said Shirley had told him that President Carter had
told her he had seen recovered alien spacecraft and aliens in a hanger. Can you
tell me exactly what President Carter said?" Shirley Maclaine replied, "He
didn't tell me that, but he told me many times that when I first wrote "Out On A
Limb" that he would support me, that it was true, that there were crafts, that
he believed there were occupants, why should we be the only people in the
universe. He wanted to shine the sunshine laws on intelligence, to expose it, to
see how the people would react, but he didn't and wouldn't and couldn't as he
explained to me." King: "back with our remaining moments with Shirley
Maclaine right after this." (Larry King Show, May 1995)
Filer's Files #9 ? 2001, 2nd Part MUFON Skywatch Investigations George A. Filer,
Director, Mutual UFO Network Eastern February 26, 2001, Sponsored by Electronic
Arts; Majorstar@aol.com.
Webmaster Chuck Warren
http://www.filersfiles.com,
PRESIDENT CARTER'S EYES TEAR OVER UFOs
Art Greenfield writes, "In your Filer's Files # 7 on 2/13/01 is the report of
the call to Larry King's show where Shirley MacLaine was asked about what
President Carter had told her about UFOs. I was that caller." The story of this
is in my soon to be printed book. Additionally, when I first called in to the
show and told the call screener what I was going to ask Shirley,the screener
said: ?Larry is going to love this!!!? I followed up with a letter to President
Carter himself, asking him to reveal what he knew to the public, but I have not
had a response. A year of so later when President Carter was a guest on the
Larry King Show, I called in and told the call screener I wanted to ask the
President what he had told Shirley MacLaine about the government knowing about
aliens and recovered UFOs was true? The screener said that President Carter had
told them he would ONLY answer questions about his new book. But that was not
the end of the story. Just a few months before Art Bell retired, he read a news
wire item at the beginning of his show. Art said that former President Jimmy
Carter had been at a bookstore in Oregon for a book signing on his new book. A
man in line to get his book autographed, asked President Carter about his
campaign promise that if elected, he would look into what the government knew
about UFOs and aliens. Art Bell said, ?President Carter just looked at the
man and did not answer in words. "Tears sprang from his eyes." Thanks to Art
Greenfield Cocoa, FL 32926
Additionally, if you want to see what ALL of the presidents have said or done
about UFOs, go to Grant Cameron's very comprehensive "Presidential UFO" site at:
http://presidentialufo.com/
Here is some of the information there about President Carter:
Jimmy Carter, the Nobel Prize, and Extraterrestrials
by Grant Cameron
www.presidentialufo.com
The most recent winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, former President Jimmy
Carter, has long been interested in the peaceful co-existence of humans on this
planet. If historic records are any indication, however, it appears that the
former President has long held a similar interest in peaceful relations with
extraterrestrials who might be visiting this planet, since his sighting of a
strange unidentified object in Leary, Georgia in 1969.
Carter has always been open to talking about the 1969 UFO sighting, which he
described as a "very remarkable sight," and "the darndest thing I have ever
seen." The Philadelphia Inquirer wrote that "Close Encounters of the Third Kind"
had been the President?s favorite movie while in the White House. Carter has
talked about it in many question and answer sessions following speeches, or on
open-line talk show promoting the many books he has written.
In a recently released audio tape of a 1976 reply to questions put to him by
National Enquirer reporter Jim McCandlish, Carter described the now infamous
1969 sighting, and how if he became President he would release all the UFO files
to the United States people. The transcript of that encounter is as follows.
Q: Governor, you once saw a UFO. If you were President would you reopen
inquiries into UFOs?
Carter: Well, no. What I would do is make information we have about those
sightings available to the public (three words unclear). I have never tried to
identify what I saw. You know, it was a light in the western sky that was very
unique. I had never seen it before. There were about 20 of us who saw it. None
of us could figure out what it was. I don't think it was anything solid. It was
just like a light. It was a curious aberration, so I don't make fun of people
who say they've see unidentified objects in the sky.
Q: The United States used to have a body that investigated UFOs, but that's been
discontinued. Would you reopen it?
Carter: I don't know yet.
Presidential candidate Carter also made a similar promise in Appleton, Wisconsin
on the morning of March 31, 1976, during a question and answer session. Carter
was asked by Thomas Heiman, Associate Director of the UFO Education Center in
Appleton Wisconsin whether he would as President, "air what's
"behind-closed-doors" today in regards to UFOs?"
Carter replied, "Yes, I would make these kinds of data available to the public,
as President, to help resolve the mystery about it."
"On a public basis?" asked Heiman. "Yes," replied Carter, "on a public basis."
Once Jimmy Carter became President, however, records at the Carter library show
that the Carter White House did everything in its power to avoid the Wisconsin
group even though Carter had promised "a meeting could be arranged sometime
after the election" when he could meet with the group and review the UFO
material they had.
The McCandlish and Wisconsin encounters illustrate the very few times Jimmy
Carter ever talked about UFOs in relation to the White House. When asked about
presidential knowledge and involvement in the UFO mystery, Carter has almost
always sidetracked the issue to talk about the 1969 UFO sighting.
An example of this reluctance to discuss his presidential role can be found in
the most recent encounter between Jimmy Carter and the UFO question, which
occurred last year. Documentary producers Tim Coleman and James Fox approached
the ex-president about UFOs while he was doing a book signing. The men planned
to use the segment in their soon to be released UFO documentary called "Out of
the Blue."
When asked about his UFO sighting Carter was very forthright quickly saying that
it was interesting and mysterious. However, when he was asked the second
question about whether or not he did look into the UFO issue during his
presidency, the enthusiasm ended. Carter simply replied, "Yes, but there's a lot
of different answers and nobody knows...has proof of things."
This reluctance to discuss the government's role could be partly due to wake-up
call that the President-elect Carter got while being briefed by then CIA
Director George Bush. According to prominent civil rights attorney Danny
Sheehan, Bush made Jimmy Carter aware of how UFOs would be treated once he
became President.
Sheehan stated that he had been told the story by Marcia Smith, then Director of
the Science and Technology Division of the Library of Congress' Congressional
Research Service. In 1977, shortly after Carter entered the White House, she had
been asked to do two studies for the Chairman of the Science &Technology
Committee of the House of Representatives. The reports would then find their way
to the White House.
Sheehan, then General Counsel to the United States Jesuit National
Headquarters-National Office of Social Ministry in Washington, was invited to
participate in the two studies, which he described as a "highly classified major
evaluation of the UFO phenomena, and extraterrestrial intelligence."
According to what Marcia Smith told Sheehan in 1977, President-elect Carter had
asked Bush for the material on UFOs during his November 1976 intelligence
briefing provided by the CIA. "I want to have the information that we have on
UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence." Carter had asked. "I want to know about
this as President."
George Bush, according to Marcia Smith, said, "No . . . that he wasn't going to
give this to him . . . that this was information that existed on a need to know
basis only. Simple curiosity on the part of the President wasn't adequate."
"If he was going to do this he would have to follow a different procedure,"
recalled Sheehan, "that was going to involve all the different branches of
government in authorizing this information, because they were afraid that
President Carter was going to somehow publicly reveal this. Bush told him that
he was going have to go to the Science and Technology Committee of the House of
Representatives, in the legislative branch, and have them ask the Congressional
Research Service to issue a request to have certain documents declassified so
that this process could go on."
President Carter followed the instructions given to him by Bush, and Marcia
Smith did produce two reports, which have never been made public. One was on
UFOs, and one was on extraterrestrial intelligence. Sheehan stated that in one
of the reports he reviewed it was concluded, "There are from two to six highly
intelligent, highly technological developed civilizations in our own galaxy over
and above our ours." Sheehan added that the report stated that the investigation
was "unable to discount" that one of these vehicles was not from one of these
two to six civilizations.
Carter went on to request a number of other UFO inquiries and studies in his
first months as President. These included a study known as the "Carter
Extraterrestrial Communication Study" contracted to the Center for the Study of
Social Policy at the Stanford Research Institute. The initial contact within the
Carter White House for the proposal was Stewart Eisenstatt, with the Domestic
Policy Staff. The Pentagon reportedly killed it three months later.
Efforts included the Carter transitional people contacting or meeting with UFO
researchers such as Robert Barrow, Jacques Vallee, J. Allen Hynek, and Bill
Pitts. Barrow, for example, was contacted about participating in another
undefined UFO study. Barrow was not contacted again, so it is not known if this
particular study went forward.
Another study of UFOs that was done for President Carter in the early days of
the administration was known as the "L.A. Study." It was put together for the
President by a number of UFO researchers in the Los Angeles area. The
researchers have told their side of the story, but no records of this study
appear at the Carter library.
Trusted Carter staff members made most of the approaches to the various
government agencies about UFOs. One such case was Press Secretary Jody Powell
who approached the FBI about their past UFO efforts. The FBI files tell little
of this request, probably because it was done by phone. Authors Lawrence Fawcett
and Barry Greenwood reported, however, that once Powell made the inquiry, the
FBI Academy at Quantico, Virginia suddenly "began monitoring and collecting
newspaper clippings that dealt with the UFO subject...under the curious file
reference of TRANSPORTATION."
Dr. Press, President Carter's Science Advisor, made the UFO contact to NASA. He
wrote NASA administrator Dr. Robert Frosch, asking for help with the UFO mail
problem, (the Carter White House was being inundated with UFO mail because of
his campaign promise to release the UFO files) but also suggesting it might be
time for another study of the UFO issue. Press suggested that a panel of
prominent scientists such as Carl Sagan might "conduct an investigation of the
validity and significance of UFO reports." NASA, aware of the probable public
relations problems involved with reopening the UFO can of worms, declined Dr.
Press's request for a new UFO investigation.
Although Carter's attempts to get a new study on UFOs failed, he presided over
what is sometimes known as the "golden years" of government UFO disclosures.
During the Carter administration literally thousands of UFO documents were
released through FOIAs by various government entities such as the FBI, NSA,
NASA, State, Air Force, Navy, and Army. What Carter's role was in the releases
is unknown, but there has been nothing quite like it since Carter left the White
House.
Although President Carter made many attempts to get the answer to the UFO
mystery, as he promised during his presidential campaign, most efforts failed.
The Washington insiders, who Carter had run his entire campaign against, cut him
off from the UFO answers which they controlled.
The military industrial complex, usually more in line with Republican
administrations, was upset at Carter for his canceling of the B-1 bomber
program, a $5 billion dollar cut in defense spending, plans to shelve the
neutron bomb, veto a nuclear aircraft carrier, and his leak during the 1980
presidential campaign where he publicly told the public, and the Russians, that
secret work was taking place on a thing called the Stealth fighter.
George Bush described the negative feeling also held towards President Carter by
the intelligence community. He had been the first CIA Director in four
administrations to be effectively fired by the new Carter administration.
Hundreds of CIA agents followed him out onto the street once Carter entered the
White House.
In his autobiography, Bush described Carter's attacks on the CIA as "frequent
and vituperative." The hatred for the CIA, according to Bush began even when he
was briefing Carter on intelligence secrets in 1976. Bush wrote,"Beneath his
surface cool, he (Carter) harbored a deep antipathy to the CIA."It is then no
wonder, that when it came to the deepest darkest secret held by the government,
that Carter found himself on the outside looking in.
As Jimmy Carter receives his Nobel Peace Prize, it might be important to note
that other important Peace Prize winners have also taken an interest in the
extraterrestrial angle of world peace. Former Prime Minister of Canada, Lester
B. Pearson actually brought up the extraterrestrial possibilities during his
acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1957.
"Perhaps there is a hopeful possibility here in the conquest of outer space.
Interplanetary activity may well give us planetary peace. Once we discover
Martian spaceships hovering over Earth's air-space, we will all come together."
"How dare they threaten us like this!"
we shall shout, as one, "at a really United
Nations!"
By the way, my book is advertised on the
Presidential UFO site:
www.presidentialufo.com/news_update.htm
Warning
Art Greenfield has just
announced a new book. He is best known to me as the man who asked Shirley
MacLaine the question on the Larry King Show about what President Jimmy Carter
had told her about crashed saucers and alien bodies. This question was based on
a story told two weeks earlier on the David Letterman show by actor Nicholas
Cage. Click HERE
for more information on the book. Or go to:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/greenfield.htm
Art
Posted by: Art
| February 27, 2005 06:00 AM
~~~~~~~
.
EXPOSING THE BIG LIE
RE: ET'S
"If you push a negative hard and deep enough
it will break through to its counterside."
- Saul Alinsky
RE: FIRST CONTACT
"At first people refuse to believe that a
strange new thing can be done
Then they begin to hope it can be done
Then they see it can be done
Then it is done and all the world wonders why it was not done centuries
ago."
- Frances Hodgson Burnett
~~~~~~~
CopyRound 2005
Worldwide LOVE Foundation
all rights well-rounded
G.O.D
VISION
-LOVE
MODEL-
the
heart
& mind
of
Global TeLeComm~unity:
High touch HEART
of high tech
With a higher understanding of LOVE
Defining, Refining, Combining and Shining
Our God-given Gifts and Talents via Net
Standards
For a New Economy
based on LOVE-centric Net Worth.
"In the beginning, G.O.D.
geometrized."
- ancient Hermetic wisdom
Care Enough to Share (LOVE) via
geonotes@mcn.net
- modern geometrized wisdom