Given all this, the future
economic enslavement of Americans is not an impossibility!
copyright 2007 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up:
Government Spin or Truth?"
---------
2) THE POWER ELITE'S CONSPIRACY AGAINST AMERICA
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
January 8, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
"Get them in debt" for centuries has been a slogan used by the power elite to
control individuals and entire nations. Regarding America, one of the driving
forces behind the conflict between Britain and Americans 240 years ago was the
colonies' printing of their own currencies in the mid-1700s. This represented an
independence from the power elite, which the latter began conspiring to crush.
The formation of the Illuminati in 1776, the year of the American Declaration of
Independence, was not by the lower class but by an elite group of "philosopher
kings" determined to overthrow existing monarchical and religious authority. In
league with powerful financial interests, these elitists desired to ensconce
themselves as philosophical rulers over the masses.
When the Illuminati was uncovered in the 1780s by the Bavarian police, they were
not destroyed but rather dispersed to many places, including France where they
formed the Parisian Outlaws League and helped foment the French Revolution in
1789. They also strategically placed themselves as tutors to young princes so
they could influence them as future rulers (e.g., Alexander I in Russia in the
early 1800s).
Three years after the French Revolution began, in the July 1792 edition of
AMERICAN MUSEUM (and NATIONAL GAZETTE), Philip Freneau tried to warn the
American people about the power elite's plan to take control of the young
independent republic of the United States. "Independence" is not long
tolerated by the power elite. I quote Freneau at length in my book THE ROAD TO
SOCIALISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER, and
a primary part of the power elite's
plan was the creation of debt "made as big as possible, as perpetual as
possible, in as few hands as possible."
And 6 years after Freneau's article
appeared, President George Washington wrote a letter on October 24, 1798,
expressing his concern about the Illuminati presence in the U.S. (letter
reproduced in my NOW IS THE DAWNING OF THE NEW AGE NEW WORLD ORDER).
Early in 1811, there was an attempt to recharter the Bank of the United States,
but it was rejected because there was resentment against the largely British
power elite's ownership of the bank's stock. Not to be thwarted, the power elite
knew that a war is always useful to force a nation back into line,
thus the War of 1812 with Britain.
As a result of the financial
hardships created by the war, on March 14, 1816, Americans reluctantly chartered
the Second Bank of the United States.
According to WEBSTER'S GUIDE TO AMERICAN HISTORY, the bank became "a
symbol of monopoly, aristocracy, and corporate power" to various groups,
and its charter renewal was opposed by President Andrew Jackson. An assassin
unsuccessfully attempted to kill Jackson, but the assassin informed
investigators that he had powerful allies in Europe supporting him.
During this same period, the Parisian Outlaws League evolved in Europe into the
League of the Just, which paid Karl Marx to write the Communist Manifesto
(1848). Marx based his thesis on the French Revolution's Comte de Saint-Simon's
Socialist principles taught to Marx by his father-in-law Ludwig von Westphalen.
While Marx presented his ideas as designed to help the working class,
the power elite used Marx's
monopolistic Socialism to further its goals via government rules and regulations
(see 1911 cartoon showing power elite members welcoming Marx and his Socialism
to Wall Street, reproduced in my THE ROAD TO SOCIALISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER).
Thwarted in its attempt to maintain control over the U.S. by rechartering the
Second Bank of the United States, the global power elite developed a strategy of
breaking up the U.S. Though the planter class of the South comprised only about
7% of the South's population, it was supported by the global power elite and it
was the primary force behind
Confederate secession (93% of
Southerners owned NO slaves).
On March 15, 1861, John L. Motley (U.S. Minister to Austria) wrote to his mother
about "the great conspiracy to establish the Southern Republic, concocted
for twenty years, and brought to maturity by Mr. (President) Buchanan's Cabinet
Ministers." Motley also in 1861 wrote a letter to the LONDON TIMES
explaining that the conspiracy was "to establish a great Gulf Empire,
including Mexico, Central America, Cuba and other islands, with unlimited cotton
fields and unlimited negroes---this is the golden vision in pursuit of which the
great Republic has been sacrificed, the beneficent Constitution subverted."
Once again, a war was created with
the power elite's hope that the
North would be driven into debt.
President Lincoln, however, began to print Greenbacks, making the power elite
furious. In M.W. Walbert's THE COMING BATTLE (1899), the author referred to an
1865 editorial by the LONDON TIMES, which stated regarding Lincoln having the
U.S. government print its own money to avoid indebtedness to the power elite:
"It will have all the money that is necessary to carry on its trade and
commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the
civilized nations of the world. The brain and wealth of all countries will go to
North America. That government must be destroyed...." On April 14, 1865,
Lincoln was assassinated, just 5 months after writing November 21, 1864, to
William Elkind expressing his concern about "the money power of the
country" and how they might destroy the Republic.
Texas cotton grower, Thomas House, an agent of the power elite, after the Civil
War prepared his son, Col. Edward M. House, to follow in his footsteps.
Col. House would guide President
Woodrow Wilson toward enactment of the power elite's Federal Reserve (1913),
which would place the U.S. in ever greater debt.
The concept of a Federal Reserve had been developed in the late 1800s by Col.
Elisha Garrison, member of the secret elitist
Skull & Bones
society. Fellow Bonesman William Whitney at the same time developed a strategy
to control both major
political parties and alternate power between them so the public thought it had
a choice when it didn't.
Also at the same time, "philosopher king" Fabian Socialists in Britain formed
and linked with the power elite members of Cecil Rhodes' secret Society of the
Elect, which was designed "to take the government of the whole world."
The Fabians and Rhodes promoted Socialism, while Col. House (President Wilson's
chief adviser) supported "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx"
(quote from House's PHILIP DRU: ADMINISTRATOR).
The goal as expressed in the 1930s by early Fabian H.G. Wells was
to synthesize Western Capitalism and
Eastern Communism into a World Socialist Government.
And in 1942, P.E. Corbett, a member of Rhodes' Association of Helpers, explained
in POST-WAR WORLDS that their goal would be accomplished
by linking regional economic
arrangements. Rhodes scholar
Richard Gardner in FOREIGN AFFAIRS (April 1974)
described how they would use GATT to
undermine national sovereignty.
FOREIGN AFFAIRS is published by the Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR), founded by Col. House and
other agents of the power elite.
And GATT is part of the "Western scheme of free trade," foretold
by Robert Hugh Benson in LORD OF THE WORLD (1907), which described the American
Socialism to come. Rhodes scholar President Bill Clinton saw to it that NAFTA
and GATT were approved not long after he became President in 1993 and wrote a
letter of support to the World Federalist Association.
In 1996, I wrote a booklet CONSPIRACY explaining what the future would be like
under "The Order." Among what I predicted was The Order's
"management"
of people, including exercise and diet. I indicated that if people didn't
"voluntarily"
exercise and eat what The Order determined they should, insurance premiums would
increase. Sure enough, ten years later on December 28, 2006, an article appeared
regarding a poll stating: "73% said they would support government
incentives for companies that reduced the cost of health care insurance for
employees who adopt healthier lifestyles and shed extra weight."
This is how the power elite works.
Remember immediately after the
attacks of 9/11, there was a poll showing two-thirds of Americans would be
willing to give up some of their freedoms in order to have safety, and shortly
thereafter we got the Patriot Act taking away some freedoms.
And remember we saw the torture of Abu Ghraib not long after a poll showed
two-thirds of Americans would
support torturing prisoners in the war on terror
(which has increased our debt).
Another way the power elite works, as I have described in previous articles, is
by psychological probes to
see what the American people will tolerate.
Just last month, President Bush had a "signing statement" attached to the postal
reform bill on December 20, 2006, indicating that in emergencies or foreign
intelligence cases, Americans' mail could be opened without judicial warrants.
Do you really believe terrorists are going to communicate with each other via
the slow, unreliable U.S. postal service? Of course, they're not.
This "signing" was actually a
psychological probe to see Americans' reaction to yet another erosion of our
rights.
The power elite's plan for America has not just involved economics and politics,
but religion as well.
Using the historical tension (wars) between Protestants and Catholics, the power
elite dialectically used
"separation of church and state"
to undermine the influence of traditional religious values on American life and
government. Via the Delphi
technique, fundamentalist Christians have been portrayed as right-wing
extremists wanting to impose their morality on everyone.
Thus, America has become
increasingly secularized,
and the power elite can therefore call for "what values we all have in
common."
The power elite is using internationally this same principle. For example, when
one doesn't look at Iraq logically but rather in terms of the power elite's
goals, one doesn't see the sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites as
undermining American efforts, but something quite different. (Just as the
pictures of Abu Ghraib didn't surface by accident, do you really believe the
photos of Saddam Hussein's hanging were allowed and circulated to the media by
accident?) Rather, the Sunnis vs. Shiite violence is
used to weary the combatants so they
will accept secularization via "separation of mosque and state."
The participants are told this is
the only way to avoid an expanded war involving other Muslim nations, and the
Wahhabites are also described as the extremist element in the scenario.
A larger war involving Iran is presented as avoidable only by deposing the
religious mullahs with a secular regime (perhaps under Dr. Froud Fouladvand,
formerly with the Shah of Iran who was also brought to power and deposed as part
of the power elite's plan). The CIA, of course, will assist in this, just as
they helped overthrow [duly elected] Iranian leader Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953.
Why do you think U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan, Ryan Crocker, is replacing Zalmay
Khalilzad in Iraq?
If you want to see what else the future holds, read the last one-third of my
CONSPIRACY booklet.
Copright 2007 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
---------
3) OUR FEUDAL FUTURE
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
July 24, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
In the 1950s, I used to watch a TV show called "Robin Hood" in which the hero
was also called the Earl or Baron of Locksley. I didn't think much about it at
the time, but then I learned President Harry Truman used to carry in his pocket
part of an 1842 poem by Alfred Lord Tennyson called "Locksley Hall." The part
Truman carried with him predicted a "parliament of man, the federation of
the world" with "universal law," and Truman explained
"That's what I have been working for."
Later in the 1950s, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund Special Studies
Project produced THE MID-CENTURY CHALLENGE TO U.S. FOREIGN POLICY, in which one
reads: "We cannot escape, and indeed should welcome, the task which
history has imposed upon us. This is the task of helping shape a
new world order in all its dimensions---spiritual, economic, political, social."
I thought it strange that the powerful Rockefellers would use the word
"spiritual" first in the "new world order," but then I
reflected upon who Robin Hood was. He had also been referred to as Robin of
Greenwood or Green Robin, named for the Green Man,
who was the Celtic vegetation god.
Thus pagan gods and goddesses
will be acceptable in the spiritual new world order.
Before President George H.W. Bush called for a "new world order,"
Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev called for it, and Gorbachev is now head of
Green Cross International
(note especially the words "Green" and "Cross"). Gorbachev (along with Maurice
Strong) is also responsible for the Earth Charter, which Gorbachev and Strong
both have stated will be like a new Ten Commandments. And they have placed the
Charter (written by Steven
Rockefeller) in the
Ark-of-Hope, modeled after the Ark of the Covenant. Do you get the religious
symbolism?
On June 25, 2001, the U.S. Conference of Mayors passed a resolution stating that
the conference "endorses the Earth Charter and commits the organization to
the realization of its aim." And one of the main goals of the Earth
Charter is to "promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations
and among nations." Thus, just as Robin Hood "redistributed
wealth" in feudal times, under the Earth Charter the wealth of primarily
middle class Americans will be given to people in other nations.
While the Earth Charter has been paraded around the world (including the U.S.),
display of the Ten
Commandments in public places has come under attack.
It seems that today we're going
"back to the feudal," not only spiritually, but economically,
politically, and socially as well.
Socially, troubadours and court jesters have been replaced by the media and
press. Recent fashions have included women's leotard-style pants and hairstyles
like men wore in feudal days, along with pan flutes (feudal music).
Politically, the King becomes Big Brother, princes and princesses become
international bankers, Knights of the Round Table become members of Cecil
Rhodes' Round Table Groups, the Sheriff (of Nottingham) becomes the U.N.
Secretary-General with his blue-helmet troops, dukes and duchesses become
corporate heads, lords and overlords become world government leaders, earls
become heads of nations, viscounts become legislative leaders, and barons and
baronesses become state governors.
[rule via the perks of profit, power
and privilege - CR]
Economically, there was no middle class in feudal times, and that's exactly why
there is an assault upon the middle class today. The tax burden today is largely
borne by the middle class, which pays a higher percentage of its income in taxes
than the serfs of feudal days paid from what they produced. Small businessmen
(regulated by bureaucrats) today have become like feudal vassals on fiefs. You
and I are like the peasants of feudal times. We're called "human capital" or
"human resources," and are to be "managed" like feudal "human chattel."
[making merchandise of people. CR]
The famous author Jack London in THE IRON HEEL (1907) said that OUR BENEVOLENT
FEUDALISM (1902) by W.J. Ghent (editor of THE AMERICAN FABIAN) was "the
textbook" the "Oligarchs" would use to rule in the future. London
stated that the Oligarchs and Plutocrats would have new ways "of molding
the thought processes of the nation," and that the banks would
constitute "one of the most important forces of the Oligarchy....The labor
castes, the Mercenaries, and the great hordes of secret agents and police...were
all pledged to the Oligarchy....The condition of the people of the abyss was
pitiable....All their old liberties were gone. They were labor-slaves. Choice of
work was denied them. Likewise was denied them...the right to bear or possess
arms. They were not land-serfs like the farmers. They were machine-serfs and
labor-serfs."
In Ghent's article, "The Next
Step: A Benevolent Feudalism,"
published in THE INDEPENDENT (April 3, 1902), he predicted that "the
coming status...will be something in the nature of a benevolent
feudalism....Group fidelity...is already observable....The autocrats...will
distribute benefits to the degree that makes a tolerant, if not satisfied,
people....A person of offensive activity may be denied work in every feudal shop
and on every feudal farm from one end of the country to the other....His actions
will be promptly communicated to the banded autocracy of dukes, earls and
marquises of industries....The individual security of place and livelihood of
its members will then depend on the harmony of their utterances and acts with
the wishes of the great nobles; and so long as they rightly fulfill their
functions their recompense will be generous.
They will be at once the assuagers of popular suspicion and discontent and
the providers of moral and intellectual anodynes for the barons....A host of
economists, preachers and editors will be ready to show indisputably that the
evolution taking place is for the best interests of all....What the barons will
most dread will be the collective assertion of the villains at the polls, but
this, from experience, they will know to be a thing of no immediate danger.
By the putting forward of a
hundred irrelevant issues they can hopelessly divide the voters at each
election; or, that failing,
there is always to be trusted as a last resort the cry of impending panic....Two
divisions of the courtier class are the judges and the politicians....They must
satisfy the demands of the multitude, and yet, on the other hand, they must obey
the commands from above....The
nobles will have attained to complete power, and the motive and operation of
Government will have become simply the registering and administering of their
collective will....Armed force will, of course, be employed to overawe the
discontented and to quiet unnecessary turbulence.
Unlike the armed forces of the old
feudalism, the nominal control will be that of the State....When the new order
is in full swing...so comprehensive and so exact will be the social and
political control that it will be exercised in a constantly widening
scope....Peace (and stability) will be the main desideratum....A happy blending
of generosity and firmness will characterize all dealings with open
discontent....(To) the prevention of discontent...the teachings of the schools
and colleges, the sermons, the editorials...and even the plays at the theaters
will be skillfully and persuasively molded."
Isn't this an accurate description of what we are witnessing today? The
power elite educationally has dumbed-down the populace and considers us no
better than the knaves and oafs of feudal times. Their attitude is exemplified
by what David Rockefeller told Congressman William Dannemeyer:
"There are some men born to
rule. Most men are born to be ruled."
The power elite simply ordered their puppets in the White House and Congress to
approve NAFTA and GATT even though an overwhelming majority of Americans opposed
both. Then through globalization, they sent manufacturing jobs overseas,
outsourced high-tech jobs, and imported guest workers to perform lower-skilled
jobs.
Why do Americans allow this to happen? It's because their retirement funds
are in 401Ks that are heavily invested in transnational corporations whose
profits increasingly come from outside the U.S. Thus, to criticize globalization
is to jeopardize one's own retirement funds. So the masses today are kept
entertained by sports (like jousts and archery contests of feudal times), music
(by the equivalent of feudal minstrels), and by TV soap operas and sitcoms (like
feudal puppet shows).
As long as Americans are willing
to be kept fat, dumb and happy, it seems futile to think our future will not be
feudal.
Copyright 2006 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or Truth?"
---------
4) THE POWER ELITE EXPOSED
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
March 16, 2004
NewsWithViews.com
There is... little doubt that the American power elite has... planned and
plotted... The power elite is not altogether 'surfaced.' ...With the wide
secrecy covering their operations and decisions, the power elite can mark their
intentions, operations and further consolidation... New men come into it [the
power elite] and assume its existence without question. --from The Power
Elite (1956) by Columbia University sociologist C. Wright Mills
The nation's immediate problem is that while the common man fights
America's wars, the intellectual elite sets its agenda. Today, whether the West
lives or dies is in the hands of its new power elite: those who set the terms of
public debate, who manipulate the symbols, who decide whether nations or leaders
will be depicted on 100 million television sets as 'good' or 'bad.' This power
elite sets the limits of the possible for Presidents and Congress. It molds the
impressions that move the nation, or that mire it. --from The Real War
(1980) by President Richard Nixon
At the national level, this conditioning of the public might be brought
about via certain crises, such as a terrorist attack... For the sake of peace
and security, people may be willing to give up certain of their freedoms to some
extent. --from The Globalists: The Power Elite Exposed (published July
2001, two months before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001) by Dennis
L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
Popular national radio talk-show host [idiot] Rush Limbaugh repeatedly refers to
anyone who believes in a one-world government conspiracy involving the Council
on Foreign Relations (CFR) as a "kook." However, on his February 7, 1995
program, he remarked: "You see, if you amount to anything in Washington
these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy League
school -- Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government -- you've shown an
aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you're plucked so to speak, and
you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in government
somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the
pluckers and the handpickers can put you."
While there are conspiracies going on in the world today, the pursuit of world
government now is no longer conspiratorial in the sense of being hidden or
secret. Rather, it's what socialist author H.G. Wells called
"The Open Conspiracy,"
as prominent people such as Bill Clinton have openly written in support of world
government. It will probably be a World Socialist Government, synthesizing
western capitalism and eastern communism. In fact, Joseph Stalin in a speech at
Sverdlov University in April 1924 pronounced that "the amalgamation and
collaboration of nations within a single world system of economy constitutes the
material basis for the victory of socialism." And regarding what world
government will ultimately mean, it will be authoritarian and repressive, for as
Lord Acton wrote: "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
In 1891, gold and diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes formed a secret society, the
Society of the Elect, to "absorb the wealth of the world" and
"to take the government of the whole world," according to Rhodes.
According to Prof. Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown
University, in The Anglo-American Establishment, Rhodes' conspiratorial secret
society lasted almost 60 years. By that time, enough members of the society and
Rhodes scholars had penetrated the areas of politics, economics, journalism and
education, so that the society was simply replaced by a network of power elite,
who would openly pursue world government.
According to Quigley, "The [Rhodes] scholarships were merely a facade to
conceal the secret society, or, more accurately, they were to be one of the
instruments by which members of the secret society could carry out Rhodes'
purpose." And in case anyone doubts the credibility of Prof. Quigley
regarding this matter, The Washington Post article (March 23, 1975) about him
and his information obtained from the power elite's
"secret records"
was titled, "The Professor
Who Knew Too Much."
Cecil Rhodes' secret society was comprised of a small "Circle of Initiates" and
a larger semi-secret "Association of Helpers" which formed Round Table Groups.
Rhodes scholars today will tell you that Rhodes abandoned his conspiratorial
plans, instead opting simply to establish Rhodes scholarships. However,
Association of Helpers member Arnold Toynbee, a world famous British historian,
revealed in a June 1931 speech to the Institute for the Study of International
Affairs at Copenhagen: "We are at present working discreetly with all our
might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of
the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips
what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local
nation states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or publicist
can perhaps not quite be burned at the stake but certainly ostracized or
discredited." (See "The
Trend of International Affairs Since The War"
in the November 1931 edition of the
Royal Institute of International Affairs' journal International Affairs.) This
was decades after Rhodes established his scholarships.
Members of the Round Table Groups along with members of the Fabian (Socialist)
Society as well as "the Inquiry" (a group formed by President Woodrow Wilson's
chief advisor, Col. Edward M. House) formed the Royal Institute of International
Affairs in Great Britain, and its American branch, the CFR. Both Prof. Quigley
in Tragedy and Hope
and CFR member Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. in
A Thousand Days
have referred to the CFR as a "front" for the power elite. And in Men and
Powers, former West Germany chancellor Helmut Schmidt referred to the CFR as
"the foreign policy elite," which prepared people for "top-level
missions" in government and "other centers of international policy"
and "had very silent
but effective ways of seeing to its own succession."
Members of Rhodes' secret society networked with Fabian Socialists, who
established the London School of Economics in 1895. One early Fabian, H.G.
Wells, in New Worlds for Old
explained what he called "a plot," whereby heads of state would come and
go, but bureaucrats trained at the London School of Economics, for example,
would remain in government making rules and regulations furthering the goals of
the Fabian Socialists. Wells broke with the Fabians, not in terms of goals, but
only in believing they should be open about them, as
he explained the coming synthesis of
western capitalism and eastern communism into a world socialist government.
In this regard, he authored
The Open Conspiracy: Blue
Prints for a World Revolution
(1928) and
The New World Order
(1939), in which he said sovereign
states (nations) would end and "countless people... will hate the new
world order... and will die protesting against it."
The power elite understood that it would be difficult to get the people of the
world to accept a world government all at once, and so a gradualistic approach
was suggested. Association of Helpers member and Canadian Rhodes scholar P.E.
Corbett in Post-War Worlds (1942) wrote: "A world association binding
together and coordinating regional groupings of states may evolve toward one
universal federal government... World government is the ultimate aim, but there
is more chance of attaining it by gradual development." More
recently, at Mikhail Gorbachev's first State of the World Forum in 1995,
Zbigniew Brzezinski (President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor)
announced that we "cannot leap into world government through one quick
step, but rather via progressive regionalization."
During the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the trend toward socialism
was obvious, but even after World War II it continued, as U.S. Rep. Carroll
Reece on April 6, 1956 delivered a speech saying, "We approach closer and
closer to socialism [i.e. monopoly capitalism for the Elite]," and
"The foundation-financed cartel promotes the idea of government by an elite."
One of the elite was Rhodes scholar Walt Rostow who, in The United
States in the World Arena (1960), proposed "an end to nationhood as it has
been historically defined." He became Deputy National Security Advisor
for President John F. Kennedy, whose Secretary of State was Rhodes scholar Dean
Rusk, who in September 1961 issued
"Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a
Peaceful World."
The same year "Freedom From
War" was issued, another
Rhodes scholar, Richard Gardner, became Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and
three years later, while still in that position, authored
In Pursuit of World Order.
The Foreword to this book was written by Rhodes scholar Harlan Cleveland, who
has been a CFR member, Ambassador to NATO, Director of International Affairs at
the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, and Chairman of the U.S. Weather
Modification Advisory Board. Cleveland's books include
The Third Try at World Order, Birth
of a New World, and
The Global Commons: Policy for the
Planet.
How would "World Order" be pursued? In the April 1974 edition of the
CFR's Foreign Affairs, Richard Gardner wrote in
"The Hard Road to World Order,"
that it would involve
"an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece."
He believed that approach
would "accomplish much
more than the old-fashioned frontal assault,"
and he further explained how GATT could be involved in the process. Gardner
would eventually become an advisor on the United Nations to CFR member Bill
Clinton's first presidential campaign, after which he would become U.S.
Ambassador to Spain, from which would come Marxist Javier Solana as the head of
NATO with the support of the Clinton administration.
Bill Clinton had become a Rhodes scholar in the late 1960s with support from
Prof. Quigley and Rhodes scholar U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, who had
authored Old Myths and New Realities (1964), announcing: "Indeed, the
concept of national sovereignty has become in our time a principle of
international anarchy... The sovereign nation can no longer serve as the
ultimate unit of personal loyalty and responsibility."
During then Governor Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign, his Rhodes scholar
roommate at Oxford University, CFR director Strobe Talbott, wrote in Time (July
20, 1992) that "perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea
after all... But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible
century to clinch the case for world government." For that article,
Talbott would receive the World Federalist Association's "Norman Cousins Global
Governance Award," and on June 22, 1993, President Clinton would send a
congratulatory letter to the WFA regarding the award, saying that previous WFA
president Norman Cousins had worked for world peace
"and world government."
President Clinton ended the letter by wishing the WFA "future success."
The WFA's objective is world
federal government, and in
1994 it published The Genius
of Federation: Why World Federation Is the Answer to Global Problems,
in which it strategized: "Let the U.N. establish new agencies such as the
International Criminal Court... National sovereignty would be gradually eroded
until it is no longer an issue. Eventually a world federation can be formally
adopted with little resistance." In November 2003, the WFA merged with
the Campaign for United Nations Reform to form a new organization called
Citizens for Global Solutions with the motto "Building a World Community
Under Law."
During his presidency, Bill Clinton would also develop a close relationship with
British Prime Minister Tony Blair (a vice-president of Socialist International),
whose "The Third Way: New
Politics for the New Century"
calling for "ethical
socialism" was published in
September 1998 by the Fabian (Socialist) Society. And in The Washington Post
(April 7, 1999), Rhodes scholar E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote
"A World Safe for Socialism,"
describing how the Democratic Leadership Council "found itself playing
host... to four Western European leaders whose parties have socialist and social
democratic roots... All subscribe to versions of the 'Third Way' approach to
politics that Blair and Clinton have been marketing."
When Bill Clinton was first campaigning for the presidency, he took a "tough"
stand concerning policy toward Communist China. However, over the years of his
presidency, his policies toward that nation took a dramatically more friendly
shift. On ABC's "This Week" (March 15, 1997), Rhodes scholar and former Clinton
administration communications director George Stephanopoulos (CFR member)
revealed: "There were a lot of reasons the president changed his policy on
China... It had little to do with [Chinese] contributions." And when
Cokie Roberts on the same program, said, "It had more to do with American
money," Stephanopoulos replied: "Council on Foreign Relations,
Lehman Brothers, Goldman-Sachs, absolutely." Quite a few Rhodes scholars
have occupied high-level positions with Goldman-Sachs over the years.
At this point, someone might say that they understand that Cecil Rhodes had a
secret society to take over the world, and that Rhodes scholars like Robert
Reich, Ira Magaziner, James Woolsey and others played important roles in the
Clinton Administration. But, they might say, "That's all over, isn't it,
now that Clinton has left office?"
It's important to remember, though, in this regard what Prof. Quigley said in
Tragedy and Hope.
He noted that William C. Whitney and
others of wealth in the late 19th century developed
a plan whereby they would control
both major political parties through financial contributions, and then have
those parties alternate power so that the public would think it had a choice.
Prof. Quigley said that Whitney's plan lasted about 16 years, and after that,
the "Eastern Establishment" (power elite) moved the Democrat and
Republican presidential candidates toward the political center,
"assiduously fostering the process behind the scenes." Prof. Quigley
also said, "the process was concealed, as much as possible," and
Quigley himself believed "the two parties should be almost identical, so
that the American people can
'throw the rascals out' at
any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy."
William C. Whitney and his son were members of Yale University's secret society
Skull & Bones. And while Rhodes scholars were penetrating the areas of
education, economics, journalism and politics, Skull & Bones member and Fabian
Socialist ally Daniel Coit Gilman brought G. Stanley Hall to Johns Hopkins
University, where he mentored Fabian Socialist ally John Dewey, the
"father of progressive education," who said in
Individualism, Old and New
that "we are in for some kind of socialism."
In economics, Skull & Bones member Thomas Daniels was Chairman of the Board of
Archer-Daniels-Midland transnational corporation, and Fabian Socialist John
Maynard Keynes was promoting his
debt-laden "Keynesian economics,"
which President Richard Nixon (CFR member) in a January 4, 1971 interview with
Rhodes scholar Howard K. Smith said he had now adopted. On September 30, 2001 on
"Fox News Sunday," Skull & Bones member President George W. Bush's
chief-of-staff Andrew Card also said he believed a combination of supply-side
and Keynesian economics works best.
In journalism, just as Rhodes scholars like Erwin Canham (president of the
American Society of Newspaper Editors) and newsmen Howard K. Smith and Charles
Collingwood along with Fabian (Socialist) Society members like Walter Lippmann
(member of "the Inquiry" and CFR founding member) became prominent, Skull &
Bones members Richard Ely Danielson became publisher of Atlantic Monthly,
Russell Wheeler Davenport became editor of Fortune, William F. Buckley, Jr.
became publisher of National Review, and Henry Luce became the founder of Time.
Luce biographer Robert Herzstein wrote: "Early on, young Harry [Henry
Luce] learned that a powerful circle of contacts and friends could move the
world."
In politics, Skull & Bones member William Howard Taft in 1912 lost his
presidential re-election bid in a three-way race similar to that of 1992 when
Skull & Bones member George H.W. Bush lost his re-election bid to Bill Clinton.
In 1912, Taft lost to Gov. Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat whose chief advisor Col.
Edward M. House had promoted in Philip Dru: Administrator "socialism as
dreamed of by Karl Marx." And in 1992, President George H.W. Bush lost
to Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton, who soon thereafter introduced a health care
plan about which Milton Friedman on C-Span (Nov. 20, 1994) said: "You
can't think of a more Socialist program than the health care program that he
[Bill Clinton] tried to get us to adopt."
Relevant to Prof. Quigley's reference to William C. Whitney's plan for an
alternation of power and the power elite's promotion of Democrat and Republican
presidential candidates whose foreign policy views are similarly globalist,
Skull & Bones member George W. Bush then succeeded Bill Clinton as president,
but foreign policy remained basically the same, which is what the power elite
want. George W. Bush, his father, and Bill Clinton all supported such things as
NAFTA, GATT, the World Trade Organization, U.N. peacekeeping operations, and
Most Favored Nation trading status for Communist China. And like his father and
Bill Clinton, President George W. Bush (whose website for his presidential
campaign of 2000 was with Illuminati Online) has appointed notable CFR members
to high-level positions in his administration. They include Colin Powell,
Christine Todd Whitman, Elaine Chao, Condoleezza Rice and Robert Zoellick.
Vice-President Dick Cheney is also a CFR member, and Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld is a former CFR member.
In the presidential campaign of 2004, among the leading Democratic challengers
to President Bush were General Wesley Clark (Rhodes scholar from Little Rock,
Arkansas) and U.S. Senator John Edwards, whose primary domestic policy advisor
was Bruce Reed (Rhodes scholar who was President Clinton's Domestic Policy
Council deputy assistant). Though each of these candidates won a state's
primary, U.S. Senator John Kerry has won far more primary states and is the
presumptive Democratic nominee for President. Like President George W. Bush,
Sen. Kerry is also a member of Skull & Bones, so whether the Democratic or
Republican nominee wins the election in November 2004, a member of Skull & Bones
will be President. And like President Bush, Sen. Kerry has also supported NAFTA,
GATT, etc., which are vitally important to the power elite.
At this point, someone might argue that neither President George H.W. Bush nor
his son, President George W. Bush, promotes socialism per se, and that is
correct. But it should be remembered that what is at work is a "process," and
when President George H.W. Bush gave us national education goals and his son's
federal education budget is the largest ever, including an element of
"accountability" to the federal Department of Education, that cannot be
considered a movement away from socialism. Similarly, when President George H.W.
Bush and his son both show some deference to the U.N., which is overwhelmingly
dominated by socialist nations, that cannot be considered a movement away from a
world socialist government. Is there really any substantial difference between
President George H.W. Bush saying the Gulf War against Iraq was conducted under
the authority of a U.N. resolution, and Bill Clinton saying on October 19, 1993
regarding Somalia that his administration is engaging in a political process
"to see how we can... do all the things the United Nations ordered [us] to
do"? And in case one doesn't believe the U.N. is pursuing world
government status, what else can one call it when the U.N.'s International
Criminal Tribunal claims the right to indict even an elected head of state of a
sovereign nation and pursue him anywhere in the world?
Concerning the United Nations, one can find examples of both Rhodes scholar and
Skull & Bones involvement. At the suggestion of President Clinton, U.N.
Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali made Rhodes scholar James Gustave Speth
head of the U.N. Development Program. This was after Vice-President Bush in 1986
had recommended Skull & Bones member William Henry Draper III for the same
position. Incidentally, Draper in 1977 had contributed $93,000 to Skull & Bones
member George W. Bush's first company, Arbusto Energy, of which Salem bin Laden
(Osama bin Laden's brother) was also a founder. Regarding other Skull & Bones
members around George H.W. Bush (whose brother, Jonathan, is a member),
Christopher Buckley (William F. Buckley, Jr.'s son) is a member of this Yale
University secret society and was a speechwriter for Vice-President Bush. And
member Bruce S. Gelb (CFR member) was director of the U.S. Information Agency
and later Ambassador to Belgium after Vice-President Bush became President. And
regarding President George W. Bush, he appointed a number of fellow Skull &
Bones members including Edward McNally (General Counsel to the Office of
Homeland Security), William Howard Taft IV (legal counsel to Secretary of State
Colin Powell), and William Henry Donaldson (Chairman of the Securities and
Exchange Commission).
In the U.S. Government, there has also been matching Rhodes scholar and Skull &
Bones involvement. In the executive branch, at the same time Rhodes scholar
Strobe Talbott was becoming number two at the State Department, President
Clinton had appointed Skull & Bones member Winston Lord (former CFR president)
as an Assistant Secretary of State. And just as President John F. Kennedy had a
number of Rhodes scholars at high levels in his administration, Skull & Bones
members McGeorge Bundy and brother William Bundy occupied high-level positions
then as well. William Bundy also worked for the CIA as have other Skull & Bones
members such as William F. Buckley, Jr., his brother James Buckley, William
Sloane Coffin, Archibald MacLeish, Richard Bissell, F. Trubee Davison, Amory
Howe Bradford (officer of The New York Times from the mid-1940s until 1963),
Richard Drain, Howard Weaver, and Hugh Cunningham (also a Rhodes scholar). Skull
& Bones member George H.W. Bush actually headed the CIA as have Rhodes scholars
Stansfield Turner and James Woolsey.
Regarding the military, Skull & Bones member Henry Stimson (who initiated George
H.W. Bush into the same secret society) was Secretary of War in the
administration of President Franklin Roosevelt, and President Clinton appointed
Rhodes scholar Gen. Wesley Clark as head of NATO forces. President Clinton also
appointed Rhodes scholar Richard Danzig as Secretary of the Navy and Rhodes
scholar Admiral Dennis C. Blair as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific
Command.
In the legislative branch, a number of Rhodes scholars and Skull & Bones members
have been in Congress, and former U.S. Senator David Boren (CFR member) is both
a Rhodes scholar and Skull & Bones member, who on August 26, 1992 wrote an
article in The New York Times advocating a rapid deployment force for the U.N.
to facilitate "the new world order." During the Clinton presidency, Sen.
Boren as a Rhodes scholar persuaded President Clinton to make George Tenet head
of the CIA, and then Sen. Boren as a Skull & Bones member persuaded fellow
Bonesman President George W. Bush to keep Tenet in that important position.
In the judicial branch, the U.S. Supreme Court has included Skull & Bones
members Potter Stewart and William Howard Taft (Chief Justice), and Rhodes
scholars John Harlan, David Souter, and Byron White. One of Justice White's law
clerks was Rhodes scholar David Kendall, who was also President Clinton's
attorney during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Outside of government, of course, Rhodes scholars and Skull & Bones members have
also been involved in important areas of American life, such as finance. Earlier
it was mentioned how quite a few Rhodes scholars have worked for Goldman-Sachs
over the years, and Skull & Bones members Averell Harriman, his brother E.
Roland Harriman, and Prescott Sheldon Bush (George H.W. Bush's father) were
partners in Brown Brothers, Harriman & Co.
These individuals have formed a network of power over the years, and although
not every Rhodes scholar and Skull & Bones member has been plotting to take over
the world, they are, for the most part,
an elite whose globalist goals must
be resisted by Americans who oppose any diminution of our Constitutional
freedoms or our national sovereignty.
How might this diminution occur? At the top of page 303 of my book,
The Globalists: The Power Elite
Exposed, published in July
2001, I state: "At the national level, this conditioning of the public
might be brought about via certain crises, such as a terrorist attack...
For the sake of peace and security, people may be willing to give up certain of
their freedoms to some extent." Then on September 11, terrorists
attacked the Pentagon near Washington, D.C., and the World Trade Center in New
York City, and a few hours later ABC News/Washington Post released poll results
showing two-thirds "say they would sacrifice some personal liberties in
support of anti-terrorism efforts." Does this mean the power elite
plotted the attacks on September 11? After all, didn't the public affairs
website indiareacts.com report on June 26 that the U.S. and Russia plan
"'limited military action' against the Taliban if the contemplated tough new
economic sanctions don't bend Afghanistan's fundamentalist regime"? And
didn't the PBS program "Jihad
in America" in 1994 show
radical Muslims speaking in the U.S. over a decade ago and saying they would
attack our airplanes and go after our high buildings? And in the same year of
1994, didn't Islamic terrorists hijack a plane in Algiers, intending to fly the
passenger aircraft full of fuel into a tall prominent structure, the Eiffel
Tower, exploding the plane over Paris?
Closer to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, didn't AirlineBiz.com on
June 23, 2001 carry a report by a Muslim who had just interviewed Osama bin
Laden and concluded that it was a race to see whether the U.S. would attack bin
Laden first or he would attack the U.S. first? Shortly after this report, didn't
the Northwest Airlines flight attendants' website carry a "Backgrounder"
by Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz referring to Project Bojinka with
hijacked airliners flying into the World Trade Center, Pentagon and other
buildings? Then on September 10, 2001, didn't some top Pentagon officials
suddenly cancel their travel plans for the next morning apparently because of
security concerns, according to two reports by Newsweek? And on the evening of
September 10, 2001, eight hours before the terrorist attacks of September 11,
didn't San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown's security people at the airport there
call him before his flight to New York City the morning of September 11 and
advise him that he and all Americans should be cautious about their air travel
(see The San Francisco Chronicle, September 12, page A17)?
How could our leaders following the
September 11 terrorist attacks here say that no one could have imagined such a
thing would occur? I filed a
Freedom of Information request regarding any warnings, alerts, or emergency
rulings by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) or other government
agencies pertaining to transportation between May 2001 and September 15 of that
year. The Department of Homeland Security replied they had found 12 relevant
Information Circulars, but they would not let me see them.
Wasn't Marcus Mabry's Newsweek Web Exclusive of September 15, 2001, about the
terrorist attacks and their aftermath titled,
"Welcome to the New World Order"?
And didn't Canadian Prime
Minister Jean Chretien say on September 29, 2001, that "there will
probably be a new order in the world that will probably be better than we have
now"?
Rather, there is a dialectic at work here. You may recall that under at State
Department contract, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield in 1962 wrote: "A world
effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which 'world government'
would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions,
characterized by... some ability to employ physical force... [But] if the
communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it
has for world government." Interestingly, Bloomfield also wrote that the
world government could come about by means of "a grave crisis or war to
bring about a sudden transformation in national attitudes sufficient for the
purpose... The order we examine may be brought into existence as a result of a
series of sudden, nasty, and traumatic shocks."
Relevant to today, it is the reaction
(public willingness to give up some
Constitutional freedoms)
to the action (terrorist
attack wherever and whenever and however it occurs)
that is important to the power elite.
And in case anyone doesn't believe
the power elite wants a diminution of our Constitutional freedoms and our
national sovereignty, just look at
Our Global Neighborhood: The Basic
Vision, a document produced
several years ago by The Commission on Global Governance, whose work was
supported by then U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Members of the
Commission included Maurice Strong (Secretary-General of the Rio Earth Summit,
co-author of the current Earth Charter, and right-hand man of U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan) and Barber Conable (former president of the World
Bank). Among the Commission's proposals are that "a new world order must
be organized... In certain fields, sovereignty has to be exercised
collectively... The principle of sovereignty must be adapted in such a way as to
balance... the interests of nations with the interests of the global
neighborhood... We strongly endorse community initiatives to... encourage the
disarming of civilians... We would like to see a permanent international
criminal court instituted as a matter of the highest priority... We are... in
need of a mobilizing principle... a new world order that secures the ascendancy
of global neighborhood values over divisive nationalism."
Of course, the public will have to be prepared to accept world government, and
what better way to do that than via education. The primary arm of the U.N.
dealing with education is UNESCO, and in its first Director -- General Sir
Julian Huxley's UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy (1948), he wrote:
"Political unification in some sort of world government will be required."
On October 3, 2003, on the occasion of the U.S. rejoining UNESCO (after
President Reagan had withdrawn the U.S.), U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige
declared: "The United States is pleased to return to UNESCO... Our
governments have entrusted us with the responsibility of preparing our children
to become citizens of the world... UNESCO is a powerful forum for sharing our
views, developing a common strategy, and implementing joint action."
The problem with the concept of
"world citizens" is that just as "citizens" of a state have to obey the laws of
that state, "citizens of the world" will be expected to obey world laws. And the
clear majority of the world's nations are socialist, so that world laws will
reflect a socialist perspective.
The conditioning of the public in the past has been gradual, but as famous
author H.G. Wells noted, the process will speed up in the end as the synthesis
toward a World Socialist Government gains greater momentum. Hopefully, Americans
will wake up before it's too late and resist this global effort on the part of
the power elite.
Copyright 2004 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved